#9335819, By The all-new Premier League thread

  • Deleted user 31 January 2013 11:18:56
    kalel wrote:
    Again, it's not a loss really. That's depreciation.

    Selling Berbatov for 25m less than you paid for him having hardly played him is a loss.
    Just cause I hate to see you right about anything:

    He's 22 years old. As a striker he's not supposed to be at his prime at this age. I don't think selling him at a lower price than they paid for him can be considered depreciation when he's supposed to have his best years ahead of him.

    Berba on the other hand was bought at his peak. So selling him had a factor of depreciation included AND yes there was a significant loss.

    So in conclusion, see the first line. :p

    Edited by mcmonkeyplc at 11:19:35 31-01-2013
Log in or register to reply