#9514810, By Global Wealth Disparity

  • Deleted user 18 April 2013 18:28:58
    Graveland wrote:
    LeoliansBro wrote:
    Stefansen is suggesting that if all the black people in Africa swapped places with all the white people in Europe, everything else remaining the same, then there would be marked decrease in European productivity and a marked increase in African productivity.

    I remember now - you were that fascist prat from Eurogamer.it weren't you?
    Isn't this partly true, though? Under European rule, Africa flourished. Granted, only the Europeans really benefitted from it but it flourished nonetheless.

    In America the social group with the highest crime rates, unemployment rates per capita are African-Americans. Is this simply because they're an oppressed minority? If so, how come Indians, Chinese and Jews are amongst the most successful groups in America?

    If it is determined that genetics play a significant role in the development of personality and intelligence, would it be morally correct to encourage those who possess such genes that will increase the likelihood of significantly low intelligence and destructive personality traits to refrain from procreation?

    Is it socially beneficial to encourage Chavs to breed en masse? Would society be improved if they were incentivised to consider sterilization? This is a serious question. Is it morally right to encourage unfit parents to bring children into the world if the likely end result will be damaged and unwanted children?
    1905 called, they want their discussions back.
Log in or register to reply