skuzzbag wrote: Which they pay for. Absolutely zero interest in the accreditation agencies passing farms. It's not like it's their main revenue stream or anything. skuzzbag wrote: But as long as they use the right fertilisers and so on, they are cool. Organic food is exactly the same food as the other stuff, just a hell of a lot more wasteful and expensive. Stuff that is grown locally is going to taste better than something transported from afar, even if that transported food is 'organic'. Organic as a label is - to me - indicative of the understanding knowledge of its target audience. It's even worse than calling something 'natural'. |
Guardian readers have no sense of irony. • Page 3
-
Khanivor 44,800 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 20 years ago -
SirScratchalot 7,921 posts
Seen 1 year ago
Registered 16 years agoNot quite true, organic stuff is likely to be plants expressing shitloads of toxins because those are the kinds that grow best without spraying. -
Khanivor 44,800 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 20 years agoSo the true organic bit is the shit that they put out and that grows on them that can kill things? Awesome.
Evidently the apple farmers are the best when it comes to paying the Soil Association:
If a farmer has a problem with a disease in apple trees called bitter pit, they can use calcium chloride, but under no other circumstances. -
Skuzz, actually read the link you posted, it's reasonable enough.
While I state that I'm pro GM, it doesn't mean I'm against organic food. I think it's selfish wasteful and a con that places on peoples ignorance, but I'm not against it
(It has a stupid name though, I propose we call it hippy-tax certified food).
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

