Page 2 • Halo Reach • Gaming • Xbox 360 • Eurogamer.net

Xerx3s 31 May 2009 15:12:12 23,970 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 17 years ago

foreverafternothing wrote:
Check my posting history, I've had a moan about the next Kojima title no doubt being another MGS game. And I've certainly attacked Nintendo's franchise updates taking precedence over new IPs.

You might have a point if MS never released a new IP but only just kept on making more of the same (like nintendo does). However, MS have released a mega ton of new exclusive IP's over the past years so that is a bit of a bull statement. Not mentioning that the Halo franchise carries a standard that others are rarely able to rival.

Syrette 31 May 2009 15:15:29 51,181 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 19 years ago

matrim83 wrote:

foreverafternothing wrote:
Check my posting history.....

We dont really give a shit. And if you dont either (as seems perfectly clear) why dont you avoid this thread?

It works out best for everyone.

Calm down.

I do give a shit - I've completed every Halo game ever released (if you don't count CE), downloaded every bit of DLC etc. I'll be getting ODST and I'll be getting the next Halo title, be it called Reach or otherwise.

ilmaestro 31 May 2009 15:34:50 32,932 posts
Seen 10 months ago
Registered 18 years ago

Yossarian wrote:
Yet another Mario/Zelda game! Do something else please Nintendo!

You're saying this as if a massive number of posters on here don't actually say this for real.

MisusedCrayon 31 May 2009 15:45:02 84 posts
Seen 11 years ago
Registered 13 years ago

Could be a full game too, the picture doesn't show a halo 3, just halo. Although, that picture would be really easy to fake =| would be a fucking awsome game though

matrim83 31 May 2009 16:10:42 5,713 posts
Seen 37 minutes ago
Registered 17 years ago

foreverafternothing wrote:

matrim83 wrote:

foreverafternothing wrote:
Check my posting history.....

We dont really give a shit. And if you dont either (as seems perfectly clear) why dont you avoid this thread?

It works out best for everyone.

Calm down.

I do give a shit - I've completed every Halo game ever released (if you don't count CE), downloaded every bit of DLC etc. I'll be getting ODST and I'll be getting the next Halo title, be it called Reach or otherwise.

Sorry, but people coming into threads going "Another sequel, another FPS, Another stealth game, I always thought XYZ was overrated" etc always annoys the hell out of me.

Yossarian 31 May 2009 16:13:37 8,429 posts
Seen 5 days ago
Registered 17 years ago

There is a Microsoft 'Halo team' which features quite a bit of known talent assembled over the past couple years (including Bungie alumni like Frank O'Connor). But whether they are working on this or something else... whether Bungie are involved with 'Reach' in any way... what Bungie's 'other' project besides ODST is... whether Peter Jackson is still involved with any of the above, and if so how... whether Halo: Reach even exists or is a forum prank...

Lotta questions, and I'm not sure any of them except the last will be answered over the next few days.

evilashchris 1 Jun 2009 09:40:03 7,785 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 16 years ago

This would be great!

Wonder if the multi would be any different?

Pirotic Moderator 1 Jun 2009 09:41:12 20,644 posts
Seen 6 days ago
Registered 20 years ago

Anybody pointed out how shit the name is yet? It sounds like a toothbrush.

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:42:54

This thread has not been merged. Shame on you.

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:43:28

disc wrote:
ODST is worse.

Absolutely. Terrible bit of fanservice, that.

Lutz 1 Jun 2009 09:44:02 48,870 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 18 years ago

DFawkes wrote:
If it's Reach though, you'd be Mjolnir-less. You'd still be awesome, but if they do the whole story ou'll start off super-skillful, then get augmented, then get the shieldless armour, then finally the real deal. Getting more powerful as you play would be quite nice (a bit Metroidish).

Um... if it's the fall of Reach, which I'd presume it is, then you'd be Mjolnir'ed up to the eyeballs.

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:44:52

All I want is anti aliasing.

Lutz 1 Jun 2009 09:45:10 48,870 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 18 years ago

squarejawhero wrote:
This thread has not been merged. Shame on you.

Hey, I was busy changing my underwear, m'kay?

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:46:26

Multitasking! I used the one-handed scoop method and kept the underwear on. Preperation, laddie.

Lutz 1 Jun 2009 09:47:50 48,870 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 18 years ago

I wasn't prepared! It was dropped on me without warning!

TBH, I'd be very surprised if we don't see another full blown Halo game this gen (ODST doesn't count, as it ain't MC and it ain't a full size game)

It's just instant money for MS.

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:48:25

This better have minorty report controls!

Lutz 1 Jun 2009 09:50:13 48,870 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 18 years ago

If you start with any form of counter mcm I'm banning you for spam.

Just so we're clear.

Buztafen 1 Jun 2009 09:53:47 17,543 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 14 years ago

If it ends up being good, i'd still buy it even if they decided to call it 'Halo: We just like making money off of you ignorant fucks....P.S - Maddies dead, SUCK IT!'

Deleted user 1 June 2009 09:54:04

It hasn't even been announced yet! I'd have to base the counter on an announcement.

Maybe I should have a counter for the announcement!

What?!

consignia 1 Jun 2009 09:57:33 1,483 posts
Seen 5 days ago
Registered 15 years ago

YoshiMcTaggis wrote:
Halo Reach-Around

Glad I'm not the only person with their mind in the gutter. I don't have anything to say about Halo, I just came in to this thread to see if some one had made the obvious joke/make the obvious joke myself.

convercide 1 Jun 2009 10:01:14 6,530 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 15 years ago

consignia wrote:

YoshiMcTaggis wrote:
Halo Reach-Around

Glad I'm not the only person with their mind in the gutter. I don't have anything to say about Halo, I just came in to this thread to see if some one had made the obvious joke/make the obvious joke myself.

That'd make two of us.

TechnoHippy 1 Jun 2009 10:05:19 19,245 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 18 years ago

DFawkes wrote:
If they wanted to tag Halo: CE onto it too, so I could actually play it again via VGA (stupid Xbox Originals version)I'd be okay with that. A bit like the new Riddick game.

That would be awesome.

Onny 1 Jun 2009 10:23:03 5,695 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 16 years ago

Squad-based FPS, set in a jungle, Spartans vs Elites, yes please.

MisusedCrayon 1 Jun 2009 10:39:11 84 posts
Seen 11 years ago
Registered 13 years ago

if bungie keep making amazing halo games, ill keep buying them, simple as.

PLUS, microsoft or bungie haven't denied it yet which they tend to do! good signs

Lutz 1 Jun 2009 10:42:12 48,870 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 18 years ago

Leolian'sBro wrote:

Onny wrote:
Squad-based FPS, set in a jungle, Spartans vs Elites, yes please.
So ... the first few levels of Halo 3 then?

Um, either a poor troll or just plain wrong.
Which is it?

The very first level of Halo 1 (Not the first few) was set in a jungle. It wasn't squad based. It wasn't vs Elites.

Wastelander 1 Jun 2009 10:42:57 1,848 posts
Seen 11 years ago
Registered 13 years ago

PC version would be nice...

Deleted user 1 June 2009 10:43:01

*3

StarchildHypocrethes 1 Jun 2009 10:44:45 33,974 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 17 years ago

The first level of Halo 3 was in a jungle wasn't it?

Halo Reach • Page 2