Tube Strikes Page 2

  • StarchildHypocrethes 9 Jun 2009 09:34:47 33,974 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    They certainly must be in the Top 5 Public Sector Cunt Showers of All Time.

    Fuck them, fire them and give their jobs to some of those Indian workers that have got IronGiant so riled up this morning.
  • myk 9 Jun 2009 09:37:13 796 posts
    Seen 22 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    I think that they should be allowed to strike, but that it should be limited so that they don't take down the entire system (say one or two lines per day). At the moment the impact of strikes is disproportionate to their demands.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 09:39:14
    myk wrote:
    I think that they should be allowed to strike, but that it should be limited so that they don't take down the entire system (say one or two lines per day). At the moment the impact of strikes is disproportionate to their demands.

    Whatever their demands they would be disporportionate, they're already overpaid.

    It's a fucking disgrace.
  • boo 9 Jun 2009 09:40:06 13,901 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    3000 strikers. 3,000,000 affected Londoners.

    Put each striking tube worker in a pit with 1,000 Londoners, and if he's still of a mind, after one hour, then he can go on strike.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 09:40:40
    boo wrote:
    Joyous. Got to get in to work tomorrow for a course that's been booked for ages, so can't be moved.

    Which means walking from Kings Cross to Victoria, and then back again at the end of the day.

    I may take a baseball bat just in case I see Bob Crow. It'll help me put my considered opinion across with a bit more impact.

    AHA! How long does that take? I might do that tomorrow.
  • boo 9 Jun 2009 09:45:51 13,901 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Google maps says 1 hour 10 mins, but I can cut across the park and save a bit of time. I reckon an hour.
  • Dougs 9 Jun 2009 09:58:38 100,414 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Except they're not public sector, strictly speaking are they? Just protected rights/Unionised from when they were - so blame the Govt that let them keep that!

    Thankfully doesn't affect me when I'm in town, but it's a shambles that pretty much an entire economy can be brought to a halt by a few hundred workers.
  • Wobble 9 Jun 2009 09:59:51 1,028 posts
    Seen 6 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    The best bit about this is the reason that they're striking:
    "they don't feel that they should be financially affected by mistakes made by bankers"

    seriously... what fucking planet are they living on?
    Why the hell is there a law not protecting london from shit like this? If you work as a part of essential infrastructure for the city then this shit needs to be made illegal.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 10:03:27
    Wobble wrote:
    The best bit about this is the reason that they're striking:
    "they don't feel that they should be financially affected by mistakes made by bankers"

    seriously... what fucking planet are they living on?
    Why the hell is there a law not protecting london from shit like this? If you work as a part of essential infrastructure for the city then this shit needs to be made illegal.

    Have you spoken to the average Tube employee? Occasionally they're alright and granted, a few are pretty cool, but most of the time they come off as bored, unintelligent cunts who've bagged an easy job with great pay.

    So yes, this doesn't suprise me that this unrealistic, idiotic view is being peddled by the Tube mafia.
  • Fatiguez 9 Jun 2009 10:06:38 8,930 posts
    Seen 3 weeks ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Don't these people already get paid more than teachers? Unbelievable
  • Dougs 9 Jun 2009 13:39:44 100,414 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Good luck anyone going to the football at Wembley tomorrow. Jesus, that would be a hellish journey.
  • Phily50 9 Jun 2009 13:59:58 2,384 posts
    Seen 7 days ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Wobble wrote:
    The best bit about this is the reason that they're striking:
    "they don't feel that they should be financially affected by mistakes made by bankers"

    According to the London Evening Standard:

    'Tube shut down by dispute over two sacked men'


    Wankers.
  • Hunam 9 Jun 2009 14:01:32 20,675 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Don't most men have two sacks?
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:02:36
    They've got a lot of balls.

    /two sack joke in case you didn't spot it.
  • MetalDog 9 Jun 2009 14:06:22 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    I am less than impressed with them this time around. I don't mind the walk so much, but it means getting up so much earlier =( Several people here are having to use holiday because it's too much of a pain for them to get in.
  • Grunk 9 Jun 2009 14:06:51 4,718 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Why can't you just sack them for not turning up to work?

    That way they don't get redundancy, they also don't get to sign on for a while I don't think.

    Then hire folk with a no-union clause in their contracts.
  • Hunam 9 Jun 2009 14:08:19 20,675 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    That's all very good ideas Grunk, and illegal, but still good ideas.
  • Phily50 9 Jun 2009 14:09:38 2,384 posts
    Seen 7 days ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    From the Standard:

    One driver, Carl Campbell, was sacked for opening the doors on the wrong side of the train at a Victoria line station, then lying about carrying out safety checks.

    The other, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is due to go on trial later this month for theft.

    RMT chief Bob Crow said he was willing to meet for further talks today - but only with the Mayor or Transport Commissioner Peter Hendy.

    Boris Johnson labelled the RMT leadership "demented".

    He has launched an unprecedented "Keep London Moving" campaign, with extra buses, more river boat services and a taxi-sharing scheme during peak hours at rail stations.

  • MetalDog 9 Jun 2009 14:10:24 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    I don't think stopping people from having the protection of a union is a good idea. There ought to be a middle ground between arsehole strikes and Masters over Slaves.
  • StarchildHypocrethes 9 Jun 2009 14:12:20 33,974 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    I think it's outrageous they were sacked for blatant breaches of working practice.

    The unions can get fucked as far as I'm concerned. I don't have one so no-one can :)
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:13:02
    Just got my oyster card fixed, the guy at the counter wasn't part of the union and was embaressed by what's going on. None of the staff had been told exactly what was going on and probably won't until the last minute, and frankly he was entirely embaressed by it because people kept asking and he didn't know.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:14:00
    I don't get why they need a union any more than people with a regular job. The rest of us work on the basic principle that if you don't like your pay, you can either find another job, or ask for a pay rise, but refusing to work until you get one isn't an opinion, and fucking damn right!
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:14:05
    Also, have to say, Boris hasn't exactly been the unprecedented disaster some were predicting before, has he...
  • MetalDog 9 Jun 2009 14:14:53 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    To be fair, no, he hasn't.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:16:32
    Plus he has the entertainment value when he falls over.
  • Deleted user 9 June 2009 14:33:57
    replace them with robots like on the dlr!
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.