Inception Page 4

  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 16:45:31 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    The Matrix is considered a crap film now? I didn't get the memo.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 16:47:57
    It also got a good write up in Variety as well. I'd link it but I'm on my iPhone so can't be arsed.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 16:47:59
    Yeah, all the cool kids are saying so.
  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 16:49:33 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Orly?
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 16:53:25
    The Avatar of its time. Clichéd but decent enough plot about a chosen white guy whose job it is to save a planet of oppressed people, both feature some corny but sympathetic new age philosophy, both have a distinct visual look and action scenes which are the most memorable things about them. Avatar, which was rubbish, is better though because the Matrix's "techno goth" idea of cool is much more irritating than Avatar's smurfs. Plus Avatar spends most of it visual innovations on cool animals and trippy space plants, which I find more interesting than Matrix's innovations on gun and kung fu action scenes.

    I watched The Matrix again last year and it was kind of unbearable to be honest. I recognise the cool stuff it did at the time but I never want to see it or hear about it again ever nevermind watch a Charlie Kaufman-esque take on it. Charlie Kaufman is the worst human being alive.

    "cool kids" lmbo
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 16:59:53
    cozeny wrote:
    The Avatar of its time. Clich√¢àö√Ç©d but decent enough plot about a chosen white guy whose job it is to save a planet of oppressed people, both feature some corny but sympathetic new age philosophy, both have a distinct visual look and action scenes which are the most memorable things about them. Avatar, which was rubbish, is better though because the Matrix's "techno goth" idea of cool is much more irritating than Avatar's smurfs. Plus Avatar spends most of it visual innovations on cool animals and trippy space plants, which I find more interesting than Matrix's innovations on gun and kung fu action scenes.

    I watched The Matrix again last year and it was kind of unbearable to be honest. I recognise the cool stuff it did at the time but I never want to see it or hear about it again ever nevermind watch a Charlie Kaufman-esque take on it. Charlie Kaufman is the worst human being alive.

    Edited by cozeny at 16:55:22 06-07-2010

    I kind of agree. As an 18 year old I thought the Matrix was brilliantly clever. As a 29 year Philosophy Postgraduate I find it painfully unwa
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 17:03:52
    @Cozeny

    I kind of agree. As an 18 year old I found the Matrix brilliantly clever. As a 29 year old philosophy postgraduate, I find it painfully pretentious.
  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 17:09:19 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    It's just a very fun popcorn movie, nothing more, nothing less. A lot of the action in it is still pretty much unrivalled, even though it's been badly imitated so many times. Yeah, it's pretentious, but it has it's tongue firmly in cheek.

    Also Charile Kaufman is the worst human being alive? Lol, cozeny. Now that's just a troll! :)
  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 17:13:29 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Yeah, the storytelling is damn good. A little lacking in the character department, but Tank is still memorable.
  • Pac-man-ate-my-wife 6 Jul 2010 17:16:48 7,087 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    It's no more pretentious than Star Wars and "The Force". It ain't pretending to be Philosophy 101, it's just a grab-bag of ideas wrapped around a great action film.
  • FutureDave 6 Jul 2010 17:29:57 535 posts
    Seen 7 days ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    I still think the original Matrix is a great film. Looking forward to Inception too.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 18:03:25
    Pac-man ate my wife wrote:
    It's no more pretentious than Star Wars and "The Force". It ain't pretending to be Philosophy 101, it's just a grab-bag of ideas wrapped around a great action film.

    Not quite sure it's just a grab bag of ideas. They attempted some sort of thesis.

    Star Wars is genuinely too stupid to be philosophically pretentious. It certainly attempts to allude to Eastern Mysticism and Zen Buddhism, but mostly from the aspirational perspective of 1970s California.
  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 18:10:01 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Why is it bad to add a little more depth to proceedings than your normal blockbuster though? I mean, it just comes off as being a bit overly critical really. Would you rather they'd gone the whole way and made a deep philisophical arthouse film?
  • M83J01P97 6 Jul 2010 18:16:11 7,607 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    A lot of people are pointing out how refreshingly unpretentious Inception is considering it's topic.

    It apparently has no Memento/Prestige style twist or wtf moment, it's just a straightforward action film with a deeply original concept and execution.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 18:23:48
    BinaryBob101 wrote:
    Why is it bad to add a little more depth to proceedings than your normal blockbuster though? I mean, it just comes off as being a bit overly critical really. Would you rather they'd gone the whole way and made a deep philisophical arthouse film?

    My point with the Matrix is that the Philosophical argument is more eager A-level student than anything else - not as clever as it thinks it is.

    As an action movie, on the other hand, it still holds up very well.
  • M83J01P97 6 Jul 2010 18:26:33 7,607 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    Luckyjim wrote:
    BinaryBob101 wrote:
    Why is it bad to add a little more depth to proceedings than your normal blockbuster though? I mean, it just comes off as being a bit overly critical really. Would you rather they'd gone the whole way and made a deep philisophical arthouse film?

    My point with the Matrix is that the Philosophical argument is more eager A-level student than anything else - not as clever as it thinks it is.

    As an action movie, on the other hand, it still holds up very well.

    To be fair, it was only the sequels that went over-board with the philosophical nonsense. The first film gets the balance perfectly right.
  • trip919 6 Jul 2010 18:28:19 2,348 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    First I've heard about this film, sounds interesting to me. Will have to catch it shortly.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 18:28:48
    M83J01P97 wrote:
    Luckyjim wrote:
    BinaryBob101 wrote:
    Why is it bad to add a little more depth to proceedings than your normal blockbuster though? I mean, it just comes off as being a bit overly critical really. Would you rather they'd gone the whole way and made a deep philisophical arthouse film?

    My point with the Matrix is that the Philosophical argument is more eager A-level student than anything else - not as clever as it thinks it is.

    As an action movie, on the other hand, it still holds up very well.

    To be fair, it was only the sequels that went over-board with the philosophical nonsense. The first film gets the balance perfectly right.


    You're probably right there. The 2nd and 3rd are awful.

    Still, looking forward to Inception.

    I wonder if Paprika was any inspiration for it.
  • ProfessorLesser 6 Jul 2010 18:32:27 19,693 posts
    Seen 4 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    I also thought of Paprika on seeing the trailer - now there's a film I want to watch again soon!

    Can't believe it's been put here that Avatar > Matrix. Silly poster.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 18:34:05
    Paprika has some of the best animation I've ever seen. It's literally jaw-dropping at points.
  • M83J01P97 6 Jul 2010 18:34:31 7,607 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    As much as I enjoyed Paprika, did anyone actually 'get' the film?

    It came across as one of those anime films that there was no point in trying to understand.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 18:37:30
    It was a bit wishy-washy but I was content only understanding 90% of it.
  • BinaryBob101 6 Jul 2010 18:50:27 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Oh, not heard of Paprika before, I'll need to track this one down.
  • ProfessorLesser 6 Jul 2010 18:51:25 19,693 posts
    Seen 4 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    The script is a bit disappointing in Paprika, but everything else about it is brilliant. If only you could combine the pace, style and excitement of Paprika with the story and finesse of Millennium Actress.
  • Deleted user 6 July 2010 20:41:34
    Paprika's great. I just finished Sky Crawlers which was "pretentious" too i.e. you may have to think about it a bit.

    Arguing about the philosophy to the Matrix when it's just a good backbone to an interesting story? Geddoudatown.
  • faux-C 6 Jul 2010 20:46:54 11,204 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Joseph Gordon Leavitt is FIT
  • Deleted user 7 July 2010 00:03:46
    squarejawhero wrote:
    Paprika's great. I just finished Sky Crawlers which was "pretentious" too i.e. you may have to think about it a bit.

    Arguing about the philosophy to the Matrix when it's just a good backbone to an interesting story? Geddoudatown.

    A film you have to think about is not pretentious (they're usually my favourite films); a film that thinks it's making you think about it is pretentious.

    The story is average in the Matrix. It's the action sequences, set design, direction and cinematography that still impresses.
  • BinaryBob101 7 Jul 2010 00:06:39 27,756 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    Good job this is an Inception thread then.
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.