Digital Photographer of the Year Winners • Page 2

billythekid 15 Jan 2010 11:59:31 12,595 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 16 years ago

RabidChild wrote:
This is so great

Odd, that was probably one of my least favourite.

Nth 15 Jan 2010 12:14:27 3,164 posts
Seen 23 hours ago
Registered 12 years ago

henro_ben wrote:

Maturin wrote:

Not always. Digital sensors can't capture the range of brightness we see with our eyes. Combining two shots to get that range in the photo seems a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Especially given a few years that'll be the range the sensors actually have.

The trouble is that 99% of people seem to have no sense of restraint when it comes to hdr...

It's a far higher percentage than that!

Nissenakke 15 Jan 2010 12:19:41 42 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 18 years ago

2, 4 and 7 are my favorites. Lots of cool photos there!

Neverness 15 Jan 2010 15:55:11 1,186 posts
Seen 1 year ago
Registered 19 years ago

kalel wrote:

otto wrote:
Aha, reason kalel posted this is there's one of him in there.

I know that can't be HDR, but there's got to be something done to that shot no? It just doesn't look right to me.

That looks a bit like 'Hyper Real' portrait stuff. Basically playing with the high pass filter.

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.