Following Celebrity Paedogeddon (now feat. other celeb sex offences) Page 276

  • Razz 30 Apr 2021 09:36:31 980 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Yeah, I hear that, cubanos are dangerous especially if you had to snitch on one.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 09:39:13 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Significant savings to be made here, who needs a judicial system when you can collate accusations, publish and let the rest unfold.

    Accused, tried and punished. Boom. Super efficient.
  • MacReadysChessWizard 30 Apr 2021 10:29:07 109 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 4 months ago
    Why couldn't it have been Noel Edmonds???? WHY?!?!?!?
  • Nexus_6 30 Apr 2021 10:47:49 6,006 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    I was getting mixed up with Noel Coward for a minute
  • nickthegun 30 Apr 2021 10:49:03 86,400 posts
    Seen 11 minutes ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Load_2.0 wrote:
    Significant savings to be made here, who needs a judicial system when you can collate accusations, publish and let the rest unfold.

    Accused, tried and punished. Boom. Super efficient.
    Itís not like itís a few randos on Twitter. This is a meticulously researched bit of journalism with testimonies from 20 women.

    By that logic papers shouldnít report anything until itís been through the courts or a tribunal.
  • robthehermit 30 Apr 2021 10:52:20 8,411 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Load_2.0 wrote:
    Significant savings to be made here, who needs a judicial system when you can collate accusations, publish and let the rest unfold.

    Accused, tried and punished. Boom. Super efficient.
    It's been that way for ages. It's a mostly effective system, and as for the malicious or unfounded allegations that ruin someones life, well, they're men so even if they didn't do that, they probably did something so it's all good.
  • Decks 30 Apr 2021 10:53:54 29,777 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    I mean if 20 woman came out and said I was a sexual deviant I'd probably start wondering about my behaviour. I'd say 8 is probably the limit.
  • TheSaint 30 Apr 2021 10:56:58 20,658 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Good to see Load and Rob standing up for the rights of powerful sexual predators.

    Not all heroes wear capes.
  • robthehermit 30 Apr 2021 11:02:43 8,411 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Hey, I said it was a good system.
  • TheSaint 30 Apr 2021 11:11:22 20,658 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Fair enough, I may have misread the tone of your post.
  • askew 30 Apr 2021 11:18:58 23,242 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    #NoTallMen
  • SnackPlissken 30 Apr 2021 11:32:18 3,199 posts
    Seen 15 minutes ago
    Registered 3 years ago
    That story about him interviewing women nude, then sharing it to his mates. Classy.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 11:43:47 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    TheSaint wrote:
    Good to see Load and Rob standing up for the rights of powerful sexual predators.

    Not all heroes wear capes.
    if you could quote my defence of his alleged behaviour that would be great.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 11:49:13 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    Load_2.0 wrote:
    Significant savings to be made here, who needs a judicial system when you can collate accusations, publish and let the rest unfold.

    Accused, tried and punished. Boom. Super efficient.
    Itís not like itís a few randos on Twitter. This is a meticulously researched bit of journalism with testimonies from 20 women.

    By that logic papers shouldnít report anything until itís been through the courts or a tribunal.
    I have no problem with reporters researching a story but as best I can tell he hasn't been arrested or charged with any offense? It seems irresponsible to name someone without any judicial process having been undertaken?

    Why have a police force if media outlets can research and punish individuals?
  • JamboWayOh 30 Apr 2021 11:54:28 23,811 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    Sounds like user Load has something to hide.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 12:01:16 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Nothing to hide, I don't even wear pants in public.
  • LegendaryApe 30 Apr 2021 12:09:15 2,415 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    User Load_2.0 got his name from wanking onto the sneeze guards in the local supermarkets.
  • JamboWayOh 30 Apr 2021 12:10:08 23,811 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    He's kinda like 2Chainz but with loads.
  • Nexus_6 30 Apr 2021 12:12:52 6,006 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    Load_2.0 wrote:
    Significant savings to be made here, who needs a judicial system when you can collate accusations, publish and let the rest unfold.

    Accused, tried and punished. Boom. Super efficient.
    Itís not like itís a few randos on Twitter. This is a meticulously researched bit of journalism with testimonies from 20 women.

    By that logic papers shouldnít report anything until itís been through the courts or a tribunal.
    And by extension this would put an end to investigative journalism as a thing.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 12:18:27 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Journalists and papers can follow whatever story they want. My issue is with bypassing judicial process.
  • nickthegun 30 Apr 2021 12:26:48 86,400 posts
    Seen 11 minutes ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    This is the Weinstein argument. Someone is using his power and privilege to be relentlessly shitty to people. Is what he did illegal? Probably not. How do the women he harassed get any form of recourse and how is he stopped doing it to other women? An article like this.

    This argument only ever comes up when itís offences against women. If it had been as thorough a takedown of him badger baiting or punching horses nobody would be crying about him not getting due process.
  • Lukus 30 Apr 2021 12:28:13 24,382 posts
    Seen 23 minutes ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Though those things wouldn't be reliant on testimony from badgers.

    I'm in two minds about these things. Journalism is not the justice system, obviously, but it's a useful way of exposing predators and getting other victims you come forth, or build up public support to put pressure on authorities to investigate. That's well documented within the whole #metoo movement, for lack of better word.

    He sounds like a cunt anyway. And with that many people accusing him of the same thing it's got to have at least some truth to it.

    Edited by Lukus at 12:31:13 30-04-2021
  • Rum_Monkey 30 Apr 2021 12:41:19 2,690 posts
    Seen 6 minutes ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    JamboWayOh wrote:
    He's kinda like 2Chainz but with loads.
    2chainz came onto the roulette table I was on when in Vegas.

    He's a liar, he had a lot more than 2.
  • Load_2.0 30 Apr 2021 12:42:19 33,052 posts
    Seen 12 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    nickthegun wrote:
    This is the Weinstein argument. Someone is using his power and privilege to be relentlessly shitty to people. Is what he did illegal? Probably not. How do the women he harassed get any form of recourse and how is he stopped doing it to other women? An article like this.

    This argument only ever comes up when itís offences against women. If it had been as thorough a takedown of him badger baiting or punching horses nobody would be crying about him not getting due process.
    The main accusations appear to be that he recorded people naked without their consent. That's clearly illegal and should be reported to the police.

    Trying to frame this as the only avenue to pursue isn't accurate.
  • simpleexplodingmaybe 30 Apr 2021 12:50:14 17,514 posts
    Seen 19 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Its also possibly worth remembering that sex crimes are hugely under reported and under prosecuted so maybe victims feel like going public is their only option even if that isnít technically the case.

    I think its some crazy low number like 5% make it to conviction after the attrition of the legal process takes its toll on the victim
  • simpleexplodingmaybe 30 Apr 2021 12:54:38 17,514 posts
    Seen 19 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    No judgement on whether theyíre right or wrong in taking that approach but it is the perception thats out there
  • robthehermit 30 Apr 2021 13:28:24 8,411 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    He was shit in Dr Who anyway, so fuck him.
  • Dougs 30 Apr 2021 13:35:45 99,081 posts
    Seen 20 minutes ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    I'd never heard of him, just looked through his filmography. Nope,not seen one thing with him in.
  • sport 30 Apr 2021 13:43:31 16,841 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Dougs wrote:
    I'd never heard of him, just looked through his filmography. Nope,not seen one thing with him in.
    That's your bank holiday sorted \o/
  • Baihu1983 30 Apr 2021 15:41:21 13,810 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 9 years ago
    Trafford wrote:
    This Noel Clarke thing, it is damning. Just as he's starring in a 5 night ITV drama finishing tonight. I wonder if they'll pull the episode?

    Reminds me of the singer and head honcho of the band Hookworms about 4 years ago.
    There was much anticipation for the 3rd album and coinciding tour, I had tickets.
    Then out of the blue there's allegations of coersive control and abusive behavior. Apparently he'd always been a champion of equal rights in the music biz.
    Not been seen since.

    Episode pulled
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.