Star Wars: The Force Awakens Page 10

  • jonsaan 31 Oct 2012 19:01:50 27,052 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    The first person to mention a Star Wars 'reboot' gets fired into the sun.
  • QotSAfan 31 Oct 2012 19:02:09 2,402 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    Well this is the best thing to happen to Star Wars in years! George Lucas won't be writing or directing? Count me in.

    Also, the originals aren't amazing, solid but they pale compared to Indiana Jones.

    Double also, Star Trek > Star Wars.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:02:44
    ecureuil wrote:
    The Jedi were ruined in the prequels. They were all boring retards with no personality, I hope the new film reinterprets them but the whole extended universe now accepts them as being monks that walk around in dressing gowns. Bleh.
    The big problem I had with it is that the originals built the Jedi up to be ancient, losts in the mists of time, virtually extinct for hundreds of years. Yet the prequels established that just twenty years previously they were fucking everywhere.
  • jonsaan 31 Oct 2012 19:05:54 27,052 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    The biggest problem I had with the prequels is Ewan McGreggor doing an impression of Terrence and Phillip. And that absolute cocktard Hayden whatsisface.
  • ronuds 31 Oct 2012 19:08:49 21,781 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    There are a million ways the prequels were terrible. Picking out a "biggest problem" can't be easy!

    In the end, they just didn't have any of the magic that made the originals special. The actors, plot, writing, setting, etc. All terrible.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:16:28
    I'll clarify that my "big problem with it" is referring to the Jedi, rather than the films themselves. The biggest problem with them as a whole is that they were made.
  • ronuds 31 Oct 2012 19:22:19 21,781 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Yep - had they never been made we could go back to having good memories of SW. Now I don't think anyone can be anything but wary of this ep. 7.

    I'm pretty sure SW will never be good again, though.
  • Whizzo 31 Oct 2012 19:24:42 44,810 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    meme wrote:
    beastmaster's going to bankrupt himself on cinema tickets.
    I believe he's a Cineworld Unlimited customer, 15 quid a month is a pretty sweet deal.
  • beastmaster 31 Oct 2012 19:32:16 22,373 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Whizzo wrote:
    meme wrote:
    beastmaster's going to bankrupt himself on cinema tickets.
    I believe he's a Cineworld Unlimited customer, 15 quid a month is a pretty sweet deal.
    Yep. Sure am. Cineworld pass ftw!

    I am really fucking sad when it comes to Star Wars. I saw The Phantom Menace [censored] times at the cinema.
  • Whizzo 31 Oct 2012 19:37:32 44,810 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    That many times? Wow, I went once at a matinee performance as I had a half day of TOIL to take, then saw it again with my best mate to confirm I hadn't dreamt its quality.

    Nope, it was still shite second time around.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:41:36
    Disney haven't really had any involvement in the marvel films so far other than leaving the people involved to it, same for pixar.

    Kathleen Kennedy does have an astounding track record as producer/executive producer so it's definitely a step up from Rick 'I do what George says' McCallum.

    Edited by Aargh. at 19:43:31 31-10-2012
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:44:10
    I think we can all be sure that these will be Film Of The Year on release. Until the next film he watches, at least.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:44:32
    The problem with the prequels is that Lucas often has some great ideas. He needs people to work with who will take those ideas and help him develop them into something that works. Alas he'd become so powerful and/or employed such sycophants that everyone just said "yes George" all the time.

    There's plenty of really good stuff in the prequels and it wouldn't have taken too much script work and a bit of editing to improve them no end. Obviously one would also have had to direct the actors better too. But there was still plenty of good in there - especially in Sith.
  • Khanivor 31 Oct 2012 19:44:57 44,800 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Script and casting. Those were the major problems with the PT, imo. And I think RotS is a damn good SW movie, with the main negative being the weak reasoning given for Anakin turning. Which, when you consider that's the central pivot of the entire series of films, was a pretty major blunder.
  • ronuds 31 Oct 2012 19:45:03 21,781 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    @ecureuil - Disney's pretty hit-and-miss with Marvel, no? Thor, Captain America, Hulk... buncha stinkers, innit? Thor was one of the biggest flops ever, ffs.

    I think it could go either way, with the odds tilting the wrong way. I'm sure it'll make plenty of money, though.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:45:48
    ecureuil wrote:
    Aargh. wrote:
    Disney haven't really had any involvement in the marvel films so far other than leaving the people involved to it, same for pixar.
    As I understand it, it's all becoming more integrated. I'm sure they'll get the right people on this film, even if they have to drag them from Pixar and Marvel. There's a ton of talented people working at Disney.
    Not as far as I'm aware. There's no cross over between Pixar and Marvel and no sign of it happening. The most so far is Lassiter getting in as the overall animation head.

    Why screw with what works?
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:47:04
    ronuds wrote:
    Thor was one of the biggest flops ever, ffs.
    Budget $150m, takings $449m

    What you on about.
  • MrSensible 31 Oct 2012 19:48:29 26,517 posts
    Seen 3 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Thor was actually my favourite one of those - and I always HATED the idea of Thor as a superhero character beforehand.
  • ronuds 31 Oct 2012 19:50:08 21,781 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Sorry, I'm thinking of John Carter!
  • Khanivor 31 Oct 2012 19:50:12 44,800 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    I'd like to see Hammil come back as an old Luke. Mentioned elsewhere on the internet, Hammil is the same age Guinness was when he first played Kenobi. Just please don't try and stuff everyone from the OT who is still drawing breath into it. I think the fan-wank overkill from the PT harmed those movies. Certainly a case where less would have been more.

    Saying that, Solo and the Wookie should get a look in as their actors appear the only ones who haven't gone to fat. Leia would need her own sail barge these days.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:51:04
    Khanivor wrote:
    Script and casting. Those were the major problems with the PT, imo. And I think RotS is a damn good SW movie, with the main negative being the weak reasoning given for Anakin turning. Which, when you consider that's the central pivot of the entire series of films, was a pretty major blunder.
    Watching them in this order really works:

    A New Hope
    The Empire Strikes Back
    Revenge of the Sith
    Return of the Jedi

    There's not much in Phantom Menace or Attack of the Clones that you need - perhaps just Anakin vs Sand People (very good sequence) and a few other moments. Sith works great as a flashback once Vader has been revealed as Anakin Skywalker in Empire. It also works leading into Jedi's portrayal of Vader as more sympathetic.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:54:56
    There's this suggestion, the machete order.

    This is:

    A New Hope
    The Empire Strikes Back
    Attack of the Clones
    Revenge of the Sith
    Return of the Jedi
  • Khanivor 31 Oct 2012 19:57:44 44,800 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    @Maturin - TPM and AotC could certainly be condensed into one movie. Then make RotS Episode II and then go on and make a new Ep3 and have it full of Vader kicking ass and the settling in of the Empire.
  • Deleted user 31 October 2012 19:58:02
    Bremenacht wrote:
    vizzini wrote:
    Ultimately the strongest point of persuasion I would make about why I now prefer 1,2,3 is that they are films about Jedi. The force is used liberally, showing it in action, its uses and showing its limits.

    I spent all those years before episode 1 wanting films that showed more Jedi things in the vein of RotJ's two highest action moments. The OT collectively uses so little in the way of midi-chlorians and precision sabre work you could only fill a BFG dream bottle. By comparison 1,2 & 3 are like an ocean full of midi-chlorian action in every film, and the fight scenes are very athletic, and high impact, way beyond even the best confrontations in Empire, or RotJ.

    Sadly others had imagined something more pedestrian, I guess.
    You are the lost character from The Big Bang Theory. The one they dropped because the writers thought he'd be too nerdy for any audience.

    The only bit that's good from all of 1, 2 and 3 is the first fight between Darth Maul and Jedi Neeson. The other 8 hours and 59 minutes are long winded shit.
    I think it just shows how one dimensional many vocal people are in this thread about their consumption of the SW universe, if they (like you) think 1,2 & 3 are poor films.

    That's a big assumption you are making. The big bang characters are all inbetweeners at best, without any popularity or sporting ability in their youth. By contrast I captained my Rugby team and went to county trials, played football for a team(defensive midfield), basketball from time to time and did outward bound, I also spent the better part of my teenage and uni years out partying too hard.
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.