Steve_Perry wrote:Terminators can only throw people around. It is a programming error. |
Terminator Genisys • Page 10
-
Load_2.0 33,583 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 18 years ago -
neilka 24,026 posts
Seen 1 hour ago
Registered 16 years agoI remember John Connor calling someone a cunt for walking in front of the camera. Not sure if they're going to address that unresolved plot point in this film. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoIn this film, Skynet attempt to take on a human form, but John Connor manages to corrupt the code by inserting a vagina-sequence into the matrix. Thus Skynet becomes a cunt.
John Connor then goes on holiday and tries to take nudey snaps of Sarah Connor (sicko) but Skynet keeps wandering into his shot. -
ubergine wrote:
Fair comment.
Movies should be about the human characters more.
Oh.
I also think Alien should never had relied on Sigourney Weaver after the second one. The series is called Alien, not fucking Ripley Again. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoYeah, similarly the series is called Terminator, not fucking John Connor Again. -
itsoldsquarejaw 280 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 9 years agoIt's called Halo, not Fucking Master Chief Again. -
Aww, Die Hard 3 was good fun. 4 and 5 were awful.
Terminator is all about John and Sarah Connor. Try to look beyond the title of the movie (In Die Hard 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Bruce didn't even die!)
-
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoI don't understand - ubergine you say you want more human characters, then say the best thing about T2 and T4 were the Terminators?
And you can't have a Terminator film without 3 things - a Terminator, John Connor and Sarah Connor. Even if they're not physically there, the storyline has to involve them or their actions. Otherwise it's just a robot action film. Similarly with Die Hard - sure you could have it without John Maclane, but then what's the point of calling it Die Hard? It's just Another Action Film. -
captbirdseye 11,190 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 16 years agoLooking good:

Filming starts today.
Edited by captbirdseye at 10:42:48 23-04-2014 -
itsoldsquarejaw 280 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 9 years agoTime to start shaving that head, Arnie. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoSteve_Perry wrote:
Well, he's the head of the human resistance. The whole reason the Terminator gets sent back etc. Suppose you could tell a story in a different part of the universe, but if it is to be at all connected to previous films his presence/impact on story has to be in there.
CosmicFuzz wrote:
I don't see why you couldn't have a terminator film with out Jesus Connor.
I don't understand - ubergine you say you want more human characters, then say the best thing about T2 and T4 were the Terminators?
And you can't have a Terminator film without 3 things - a Terminator, John Connor and Sarah Connor. Even if they're not physically there, the storyline has to involve them or their actions. Otherwise it's just a robot action film. Similarly with Die Hard - sure you could have it without John Maclane, but then what's the point of calling it Die Hard? It's just Another Action Film. -
beastmaster 22,373 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 17 years agoThere's been a few plot details revealed by the Austrian Oak himself. I've got to admit, it does seem rather good. -
sega 908 posts
Seen 7 years ago
Registered 14 years agoTerminator isn't a story that works well with sequels. In the first one they talk about how they destroyed the time device after Kyle Reece goes through. In the second you just assume that they didn't or John just doesn't tell Reese he's sending another (better) protector to the 90's too.
However it becomes a bit of a joke when more and more keep getting sent through time. The amount of attempts even make Skynet look incompetent and not much of a threat. Besides Judgement Day was 1997 - it has passed and they now have to make excuses for the date moving, the T-800 getting noticeably older, why more than two Terminators were sent back and the entire message of "the future is not set" being changed to "Judgement Day is inevitable." -
Ultrasoundwave 6,440 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 11 years agoI just don't know about this one - I'm confident that it will be at least better than Terminator : Salvation. Considering that was written by the duo who wrote the Catwoman movie and directed by McG, this one immediately has an advantage IMO.
Alan Taylor has an impressive CV and the lead writer wrote Shutter Island, so who knows?.
I'm a bit sceptical about Arnie playing an aged terminator, why they can't just airbrush him in Post-Production (like Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan in X3) i don't know???
/ Cautiously optimistic -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoCould do a spin-off with other characters, yeah, but it wouldn't be a 'proper' Terminator film in my eyes. Although the franchise has been fucked over so badly at this point, a spin-off like that might actually be the best thing for it! -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agosega wrote:
A) They could just build more time machines
Terminator isn't a story that works well with sequels. In the first one they talk about how they destroyed the time device after Kyle Reece goes through. In the second you just assume that they didn't or John just doesn't tell Reese he's sending another (better) protector to the 90's too.
However it becomes a bit of a joke when more and more keep getting sent through time. The amount of attempts even make Skynet look incompetent and not much of a threat. Besides Judgement Day was 1997 - it has passed and they now have to make excuses for the date moving, the T-800 getting noticeably older, why more than two Terminators were sent back and the entire message of "the future is not set" being changed to "Judgement Day is inevitable."
B) Judgement Day did happen at the end of T3 remember
The T800 getting older is a problem, yeah. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoUltrasoundwave wrote:
To be fair, Shutter Island was based on a book, so it wasnt' as if he wrote it all from scratch. And the deaging in X3 was fucking terrible.
I just don't know about this one - I'm confident that it will be at least better than Terminator : Salvation. Considering that was written by the duo who wrote the Catwoman movie and directed by McG, this one immediately has an advantage IMO.
Alan Taylor has an impressive CV and the lead writer wrote Shutter Island, so who knows?.
I'm a bit sceptical about Arnie playing an aged terminator, why they can't just airbrush him in Post-Production (like Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan in X3) i don't know???
/ Cautiously optimistic -
beastmaster 22,373 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 17 years agoCosmicFuzz wrote:
sega wrote:
"Living tissue over a metal endoskeleton". Apparently it's tissue that ages over time, the same as humans. Which is one of the plot points.
The T800 getting older is a problem, yeah.
Edited by beastmaster at 11:00:25 23-04-2014 -
Ultrasoundwave 6,440 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 11 years agoX3 is 8 years old now, so i'd like to think the tech would be a bit better these days.
The writer wrote the screenplay for Shutter Island (deepest apologies for not explaining) and i thought the screenplay (and the movie) was excellent.
Just trying to get some optimism going i guess.... -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agobeastmaster wrote:
CosmicFuzz wrote:
Yeah I know, we were talking about it on the last page. It's pretty weak reasoning I think. He'll still move like an old man.
sega wrote:
"Living tissue over a metal endoskeleton". Apparently it's tissue that ages over time, which is one of the plot points.
The T800 getting older is a problem, yeah. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 51 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoUltrasoundwave wrote:
X3 is 8 years old now, so i'd like to think the tech would be a bit better these days.
The writer wrote the screenplay for Shutter Island (deepest apologies for not explaining) and i thought the screenplay (and the movie) was excellent.
Just trying to get some optimism going i guess....
He may have written the screenplay, but it was based off a book by Dennis Lehane, so he didn't come up with it all himself, just adapted it (not that adapting something is easy, just saying).
I'm actually cautiously optimistic for this film too, despite how I'm coming across! You're right, it's a far stronger team behind this than Salvation. Based on Arnie's recent output though, he's possibly the weakest link in this... -
Ah, I missed that. Arnie has said that there will be a younger terminator in the film.
Cautiously optimistic seems to be the best approach here.
Edit: Slightly off tangent here but if Paul Verhoven comes back to direct the next Conan film, that would just be fucking fantastic!
Edited by beastmaster at 11:06:36 23-04-2014
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
