Blakester wrote:Watched it when it came out and was so meh about it, I wasn't even gonna talk about it here, till you mentioned that bit. I mean, the couch in the first 10mins was bad enough, but the safety net? Why they f*ck would there even be a safety net there in the first place for an abandoned building rigid to be destroyed? I really rolled my eyes at that bit. |
Bond 24 - Spectre - Directed by Sam Mendes • Page 22
-
The-Bodybuilder 17,871 posts
Seen 3 months ago
Registered 17 years ago -
Not-a-reviewer 7,686 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 7 years agoThere's no reason there can't be a direct sequel. It's not the first time bond has been in the position they left him in. -
beastmaster wrote:
Yup. It seems that he's the only director that can make a decent Bond. Both were far better than each actor led films that followed.
Calling Martin Campbell.
He did an excellent job with Goldeneye and Casino Royale.
Royale was so good, QoS was awful and Skyfall was meh. I still don't get the fuas that received when it came out. -
Saul_Iscariot 4,399 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years ago@TheSaint It would have been a 5/10 had you not had the obnoxious parents distracting you. -
Not-a-reviewer 7,686 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 7 years agoBoth of those had a long time to write/post produce too. -
Saul_Iscariot 4,399 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years ago@reviewer Who? The kids? He said they were both under five. Sure in films terms that is a long time to develop, but they also have to master communication, pooping and crawling/walking as well. -
jimnastics 1,893 posts
Seen 11 hours ago
Registered 10 years agoeightbitboy wrote:
I don't know much about Sam Smith, but that theme tune was fucking dire... it was the first time I had heard it and it put me in a bad mood for the start of the main film, after the excellent intro sequence. The guy's voice when he was singing the chorus was like nails on a blackboard, absolutely horrific.
backed by a great theme song performed by Sam Smith. -
Saul_Iscariot 4,399 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years ago@jimnastics The Sam Smith song is an odd one for me. Let me be clear I don't think it is any good. But when you hear him describing how he went about writing it and singing it it sounds more like a song with ambition that did not quite deliver. The vocals are higher than his natural range, and he sang it live on Graham Norton and it was far better than the recording. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 57 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoIt's shite. -
Saul_Iscariot 4,399 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoYes, it is, but not in its ambition. And I appreciate a singer that tries to challenge themselves. -
He sounds the same in all his songs. -
Saul_Iscariot 4,399 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoAccording to him he had top present a treatise on it, then a demo, then record it. If that is thirty minutes work, then hats off to him. I think I am slowly getting more and more done with conversations of this nature. -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 57 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoIt was 20 minutes work.
And it was shite.
-
I must be deaf cos it just sounds like standard Bond fare to me, not sure why it's getting the hate -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 57 minutes ago
Registered 15 years agoYou just don't GET Bond, PES. -
This is very true, I'm often getting Bond wrong -
STOP GETTING BOND WRONG! -
The Sam Smith song was a bit crap tbh. I can appreciate somebody trying to push themselves, but when they push themselves into delivering what's quite a weedy "traditional" Bond ballad, well it's going to fall short.
Shirley Bassey did the big, orchestral belting-the-lungs out thing exceptionally well, and if you try to copy that and fall short it's never going to hold up well. Would rather they tried something different. -
2 minutes of theme tune in a 150 minute film is the most important part -
JYM60 19,085 posts
Seen 4 days ago
Registered 15 years agoI think the song is decent, but not right for a Bond theme song. Not powerful or epic enough.
In regards the safety net. I think it's a reference to the whole film being a 'safety net'. -
JuanKerr 37,710 posts
Seen 10 months ago
Registered 15 years agoI've ofen wondered what it's like to pick apart and dissect every little thing. Do you people actually enjoy anything? -
brigadier 1,036 posts
Seen 2 months ago
Registered 16 years agoI'm usually easily pleased with movies but this was just 'okay'. Way too long. Too many nonsensical things. I know it's Bond, but there's a line to be crossed. When the helicopter crashes on the bridge and there's already a police cordon around it
Everything was way too convenient.
The scenes with Monica Belluci (as much as I adore her) were ridiculous, the love interest was ridiculous. She hates him and loves him withn 5 minutes for no reason.
And I didn't like the direct references to previous movies that I haven't seen. The Chinese people in the cinema were confused and bored off their tits. The chatters, people talking on the phone, the screaming kids and classless parents soured the experience for me I guess. It's okay for them fuckers, they can read the subtitles I had to bastard listen to it.
I knew Chinese people didn't have manners at the cinema as I've been dozens of times, but this was something special. A reflection on the movie perhaps. -
@The-Bodybuilder There's an interview with Craig talking before the release of Casino Royale - he talks about making Bond more fallible, a character that makes mistakes and that that increases the sense of peril when he's in tight situations.
Spectre doesn't bother and I think it's less gripping as a result. I rolled my eyes at the escape from the building. But there was also a totally lack of jeopardy to begin with.
It's not that I don't expect Bond to escape, that's a given. But at least in Casino Royale there was a sense that he was getting things as wrong as he was right and that meant I wanted to see how he'd get out of the tight squeezes and what the consequences would be. -
docrob 1,795 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 13 years agoSaw this yesterday. It was OK, I enjoyed it as a film, but it strikes me that all of the Daniel Craig Bond films have lost their way (despite Casino Royale being brilliant). They've lost their sense of fun and become way too serious. There's something inherently ridiculous about a good Bond movie - it doesn't take itself too seriously, and that makes it easier to accept ludicrous escapes from danger. Spectre may be a good film, but it's too serious to be a good Bond. -
Not-a-reviewer 7,686 posts
Seen 1 week ago
Registered 7 years agoIt was too serious? It was Roger Moore levels of ridiculous at times. -
brigadier wrote:
The love interest was ridiculous. She hates him and loves him within 5 minutes for no reason
Christ I completely forgot about that - when she said "I love you" I remember looking around at other people in the cinema, trying to find someone with the same "what the fuck!?" expression on their face.
Alas, it was too dark to see, but I'm sure everyone must have had the same reaction.....
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
