Just announced: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/comic-con-the-marvel-panel-the-title-and-villain-for-the-avengers-sequel-revealed Edited by Razz at 14:40:43 21-07-2013 |
The Avengers: Age of Ultron (Avengers 2)
-
MrWorf 64,187 posts
Seen 12 hours ago
Registered 20 years ago -
Moot_Point 5,530 posts
Seen 5 years ago
Registered 9 years agoHaha, poor Charlie! -
M83J01P97 7,607 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 14 years agoPart of me wonders whether they should just leave it at one Avengers movie for the time being and explore other areas of the Marvel universe for the time being. Once we have had Thor/Captain America 2 I'm not really interested in seeing anymore of those characters on the big screen. But that's just me... -
spamdangled 31,803 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 13 years agoM83J01P97 wrote:
Well they are, which is why we have the Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-Man pictures coming. They've recently managed to get back hold of the Daredevil rights too, so they're probably starting to think about that as well.
Part of me wonders whether they should just leave it at one Avengers movie for the time being and explore other areas of the Marvel universe for the time being. Once we have had Thor/Captain America 2 I'm not really interested in seeing anymore of those characters on the big screen. But that's just me... -
spamdangled 31,803 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 13 years agoAs for this film, I have faith in Whedon and if anyone can pull off a whole host of new heroes in this one (Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch and Hank Pym are so far all confirmed, as it presumably Vision if Ultron is in this), however if they're basing it on the recent comics event (which, going by the title, they are), then I'm very worried as that was one of the biggest piles of shite Marvel have put out in years. -
M83J01P97 7,607 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 14 years agodarkmorgado wrote:
Those are still only two aspects of the rich tapestry of characters and stories that could work really well on screen.
M83J01P97 wrote:
Well they are, which is why we have the Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-Man pictures coming. They've recently managed to get back hold of the Daredevil rights too, so they're probably starting to think about that as well.
Part of me wonders whether they should just leave it at one Avengers movie for the time being and explore other areas of the Marvel universe for the time being. Once we have had Thor/Captain America 2 I'm not really interested in seeing anymore of those characters on the big screen. But that's just me... -
Moot_Point 5,530 posts
Seen 5 years ago
Registered 9 years agoI thought the Affleck DD movie was incredibly poor, IMO. Well in need of a reboot. -
M83J01P97 7,607 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 14 years agoAlso, if The Wolverine is anything to go by... the sooner they get the rights back to the X-Men the better, although I doubt that will happen anytime soon. -
spamdangled 31,803 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 13 years agoMoot_Point wrote:
The director's cut wasn't actually half-bad.
I thought the Affleck DD movie was incredibly poor, IMO. Well in need of a reboot. -
spamdangled 31,803 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 13 years agoM83J01P97 wrote:
Along with Spider-Man, that's not likely to happen anytime soon.
Also, if The Wolverine is anything to go by... the sooner they get the rights back to the X-Men the better, although I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
I'd quite like them to get back the rights to Fantastic Four. Whedon would be great with the FF. -
Moot_Point 5,530 posts
Seen 5 years ago
Registered 9 years agodarkmorgado wrote:
Oh, never saw that. Not really an Affleck fan, so doubt I would go out of my way to seek out a copy of the DC.
Moot_Point wrote:
The director's cut wasn't actually half-bad.
I thought the Affleck DD movie was incredibly poor, IMO. Well in need of a reboot. -
M83J01P97 wrote:
I liked First Class. Fassbender's slide into his native tongue at the finale non-withstanding.
Also, if The Wolverine is anything to go by... the sooner they get the rights back to the X-Men the better, although I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
Wolverine blows chunks though. -
darkmorgado wrote:
Played by Vin Diesel, allegedly.
Vision if Ultron is in this -
spamdangled 31,803 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 13 years agomeme wrote:
Yeah I saw that the other day. He actually looks the part, funnily enough. And with Scarlet Witch already on the cast list it's a bit of a no-brainer.
darkmorgado wrote:
Played by Vin Diesel, allegedly.
Vision if Ultron is in this -
nickthegun 87,711 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoI hope its nothing like the recent age of ultron 'event' because that absolutely fucking sucked. -
HoriZon 14,351 posts
Seen 15 hours ago
Registered 19 years agoQuicksilver, Scarlet Witch plans might have changed if rumours are too believed as they are both heading for X-Men DOFP Quicksikver has already been cast. Been Magneto's kids an all.
Edited by HoriZon at 08:11:19 22-07-2013 -
Mola_Ram 26,187 posts
Seen 34 minutes ago
Registered 9 years agoMy god that is a gloriously silly title. -
Derblington 35,161 posts
Seen 20 hours ago
Registered 17 years agoThe see-saw is in both films. The DC ads an extra subplot with another villain, iirc. I don't remember the film being better with the additions - it contains all the same shit that plague the theatrical release.
It's just not very good. -
roz123 7,104 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 13 years agoUltron sounds like washing machine powder
Edited by roz123 at 09:20:16 22-07-2013 -
HoriZon 14,351 posts
Seen 15 hours ago
Registered 19 years agoShikasama wrote:
Quicksikver is played by Evan Peters and he was with the X-Men cast at comic con.
HoriZon wrote:
Nah they are having a different origin. They are both English superheroes and Quicksilver has already been cast for the Avengers.
Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch plans might have changed if rumours are too believed as they are both heading for X-Men DOFP Quicksikver has already been cast. Been Magneto's kids an all.
Apparently there is no problem with using thema s long as they aren't referred to as mutants. Which does make you wonder why bother using them at all.
Edited by HoriZon at 09:44:25 22-07-2013 -
nickthegun 87,711 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoShikasama wrote:
its half arsed and stupid. The first part, set after the end of the world was kind of OK but then it turned into a load of idiotic time travel nonsense and a series of ass-pulls more ludicrous than the last.
What is so bad about the event?
And then, weirdly, Neil Gaimans 'angela', a character first seen in spawn, appeared.
(gaiman won angela back from mcfarlane and the crossover ended up being a long and boring way of introducing her to the MU)
Edited by nickthegun at 09:46:30 22-07-2013 -
nickthegun 87,711 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoSpoilers -
Oh, and it ended being another 'the crazy adventures of wolverine' like he isnt already infesting every other comic in the stable.
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
