|
Still can't recall an ad on here that was genuinely intruding on my browsing. Certainly nothing for me to go off in a huff and download AdBlock because I can't control my mouse properly. Man up, you lot. |
Let's talk about AdBlock... • Page 10
-
Syrette 51,181 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 19 years ago -
dominalien 10,703 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 15 years agoSyrette wrote:
Adblock doesn't cure that, pills do.
Still can't recall an ad on here that was genuinely intruding on my browsing. Certainly nothing for me to go off in a huff and download AdBlock because I can't control my mouse properly.
Man up, you lot. -
BartonFink 35,268 posts
Seen 2 months ago
Registered 20 years agoSyrette wrote:
^^^ This x1000
Still can't recall an ad on here that was genuinely intruding on my browsing. Certainly nothing for me to go off in a huff and download AdBlock because I can't control my mouse properly.
Man up, you lot.
AdBlock is evil - devil spawn. -
Tonka 31,980 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoSpot the Linux users. -
dominalien 10,703 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 15 years agoI see no one. -
Cappy 14,394 posts
Seen 22 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoAs an experiment I put adblock on yesterday, morning 24 hours later I have to say it's been a completely positive experience.
The on and off performance problems I was getting when watching videos via my web browser haven't turned up at all since then. Considering that EG is the only gaming site I visit, I don't typically visit elsewhere and EG is the most advertising heavy site I do visit, EG is likely the culprit.
What made me switch it on is rauper's disinclination to accept culpability in people using adblock in the first place. No, it's not those 'other' sites, it's you. Admission of what you've been allowing is necessary, in terms of the traditional paradigm, advertisers were paying to reach the customers, they paid for space on pages, they were paying for the paper, they were paying for the ink.
What we have here is you allowing advertisers to swipe my paper and ink for the purposes of their advertising when my computer's resources are getting hogged and I'm getting problems which are interfering with my usage of the computer. I'll continue to monitor things today, I'm already seeing a massive reduction in the amount of RAM being tied up by Safari. -
Tonka 31,980 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoCappy wrote:
I think starting this thread and asking people to switch on acceptable ads is a huge admission. This discussion is held on many levels at many publishing houses all over the world. They have realized that jamming a page full of blinking flash banners is bad for visitors AND advertisers.
What made me switch it on is rauper's disinclination to accept culpability in people using adblock in the first place.
I have some experience of banner making and I have seen click through rates and how placement, audience and competition for attention influence it.
It's not just Flash vs Not Flash. I once made a flashbanner that was so popular that one of the sites running it asked if they could keep it up after the advertiser stopped paying for it.
So back to the beginning. I think it's a great step in the right direction to switch to the non-intrusive banners. I also hope EG can branch out and place banners based on the topics of non gaming related forum threads.
That might already be a thing come to think of it, I haven't had adblock off for long enough to know.
But why not some autogenerated Amazon links to Roombas in the Roomba thread?
Is that a thing already? -
Ginger 7,256 posts
Seen 3 weeks ago
Registered 19 years agoGiven the openess Rauper has shown with this, I'd be interested to see if he's willing to share any results - increased impressions and so on. -
Salaman 24,162 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 17 years agoOne thing I find weird in all this is thatEG as a site puts it's screen real estate available for advertisers.
They then define what the advertisers can do within that space.
Because advertisers are clamouring for attention, their ads become more and more intrusive and people get fed up and block them out completely.
They're now going to pay the people blocking the ads, to let through certain ads that are "acceptable".
Wouldn't it be easier to redefine your own rules about what advertisers are allowed to do to be in line with what ABP define as acceptable ads. That's free and has the same result. You may have some extra work to make it know to people using adblockers that they can safely turn them off on your site. Still, it's free and you're not just tied to ABP. -
BartonFink 35,268 posts
Seen 2 months ago
Registered 20 years agoSalaman wrote:
Maybe I am misinterpreting this but I think you got that one assbackways - this initiative came from AdBlock not the Advertisers. A nice little earner for ABP.
Because advertisers are clamouring for attention, their ads become more and more intrusive and people get fed up and block them out completely.
They're now going to pay the people blocking the ads, to let through certain ads that are "acceptable".
-
Salaman 24,162 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 17 years agoYeah, the initiative came from ABP and they earn some money. Rather than pay ABP, couldn't EG change their policy about what type of ads they allow on the site? If they only allow "acdeptable" ads to be placed on EG, you have the same result but for free.
The difference is that through ABP, people will see the acceptable ads even though ABP is turned on (which may cause them to switch ad blockers if they object even to the acceptable ads) off of their own initiative, they'll have to somehow notify people that they should give EG ago without adblock on, as the ads have become less intrusive. -
Tonka 31,980 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoAre EG paying ABP for this? That is weird. -
I must be the only person who actually likes ads. They're nice and colourful, as long as they don't auto-play video or flash. The Witcher 3 one and the Call of Duty one that is on the site and the moment, I actually quite like. The Nintendo one that flashes is annoying though.
I wonder what the page would look like with AdBlock installed, do you just get massive white spaces and margins at the side of the screen? I think I actually prefer having colour there, on a desktop.
My work PC is hardly a gaming shirehorse PC either, you lot moaning must have pussy-ass PCs. -
misslara 9 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 7 years agoI use Adblock on some sites and turn it off on others, if there aren't pop ups slowing down my computer I don't care about banner ads or rollovers -
Psychotext 70,652 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 15 years agoSyrette wrote:
I've had broken ads literally stop sites from loading and crash browsers before now... so yeah, some can be quite intrusive indeed.
Still can't recall an ad on here that was genuinely intruding on my browsing. Certainly nothing for me to go off in a huff and download AdBlock because I can't control my mouse properly.
Man up, you lot. -
BigOrkWaaagh 10,554 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 14 years agoBefore this thread I had never even considered installing ABP, but I was at work today and the site kept crashing my fucking browser with animated banners at the top and videos running on the side. I just installed ABP and it's like another world. -
Lovely auto-playing and looping video on the current Call of Duty ad, I'll stick with the nice Witcher 3 ad. -
RyanDS 14,074 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 13 years agoRauper. Genuine question.
Have EG thought about running some sensible ads instead of having two extremes of ads, with one side being white and barely visible and the other being hideous monstrosities?
I have just logged into my work PC having been off a few days, and the front page is some Driveclub horror, with flashing, cars racing across the screen and generally the best advert for adblock I have ever seen.
Why don't EG try an experiment and have ads that are a bit more restrained that don't go so over the top? I did try a few days without adblock, but it just makes the site a nightmare. Are static ad really that poor performing in terms of revenue collection that they won't make up for the huge increase in general enjoyment of the site for your readers? -
Tonka 31,980 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoBad news everyone.
RichMediaContent enhances click rates by nearly 100% -
BigOrkWaaagh 10,554 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 14 years agoI would put good money on that increase being exclusively down to the fucking page jumping around while the ad loads and people not clicking the thing they actually wanted to. -
Salaman 24,162 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 17 years agoTonka wrote:
Probably with a bounce rate of 100% on the landing page of the ad.
RichMediaContent enhances click rates by nearly 100% -
Tonka 31,980 posts
Seen 12 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoBigOrkWaaagh wrote:
Could also be people trying to drag shit around on the banner and "accidentally" clicking it.
I would put good money on that increase being exclusively down to the fucking page jumping around while the ad loads and people not clicking the thing they actually wanted to. -
BigOrkWaaagh wrote:
It's the only time I ever click on an ad - by mistake.
I would put good money on that increase being exclusively down to the fucking page jumping around while the ad loads and people not clicking the thing they actually wanted to. -
Cappy 14,394 posts
Seen 22 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoI'm constantly clicking ads by mistake.
Why do they make the ad 'hotzone' extend right up to the edge of the page where I want to click and drag the scroll bar? There's nothing even there, it looks like empty space. -
Cappy 14,394 posts
Seen 22 hours ago
Registered 16 years ago -
Psiloc 6,368 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 14 years agoRyanDS wrote:
Because people with adblock on still wouldn't see it. There's no point in them dictating various rules to advertisers when the users who care about such things are blocking them anyway. This is why the acceptable ads thing exists in the first place IMO.
Rauper. Genuine question.
Have EG thought about running some sensible ads instead of having two extremes of ads, with one side being white and barely visible and the other being hideous monstrosities?
...
Why don't EG try an experiment and have ads that are a bit more restrained that don't go so over the top?
Anyway I've just switched to ABP from AB and can see the ads so it's working nicely, though I now feel a bit uncomfortable that I'm supporting a racket. Must be worth EG's while though or they wouldn't be doing it, but I would be interested to know the details. -
Destinyfest 2014 will pretty much end at the end of the week when we enter silly season and there's other games to talk about.
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
