Following Bye bye review scores Page 20

  • cov 24 Feb 2015 12:44:52 2,524 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Badges = opinions = subjective

    Badges are not numbers

    numbers appeared to be objective qualitative ratings but weren't

    Trying to convert badges into numbers is a reductive exercise going against the entire point of the badges and reintroducing the fundamental issue of numbers never being able to reflect a subjective opinion.
  • mrpon 24 Feb 2015 12:47:12 37,367 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    eight out of ten?
  • Deleted user 24 February 2015 12:50:43
    Its going to be human nature for people to try and 'guess' the number on a review, which is why that any games 'unbadged' will be given a slightly injustice IMO.
  • Kosmoz 24 Feb 2015 12:53:33 8,184 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    People really will argue about anything, won't they?
  • Deleted user 24 February 2015 12:53:47
    Fuck you!
  • cov 24 Feb 2015 12:58:09 2,524 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    No that's inertia from having had review scores and will become less of an issue as time goes on.. simple nature of change, even if it's the right change people cling to what they knew even if it was flawed

    However you are right in that there will always be a core of people who want to be told what to think, ironically often the same ones who then violently disagree with a score because that is the nature of reviews - they are subjective opinions and any overview of a subjective opinion should be a guide or indicator not a metric

    I recommend, I like, I don't like
    not it is good or bad

    Edited by cov at 12:58:55 24-02-2015
  • Ultrasoundwave 24 Feb 2015 13:51:27 6,440 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    TarickStonefire wrote:
    Ultrasoundwave wrote:
    Just read the Order review and I really don't understand this whole "no opinion/blank" review score thingy?

    Using my limited intelligence, I am able to understand 'Avoid', 'Recommended' and 'Essential' but, in my opinion, they really need a label for that middle tier.

    'Mediocre'?, 'Average'?, 'Disregard'?
    I kind of agree with you. Seems just confusing to not have one, when by not having one they essentially do have one, it's just invisible apparently. Mediocre, average, maybe 'Middle Of The Road' or 'Nothing Special'.
    Yeah they definitely need something - whoever decided that they would have a rating that is literally nothing needs to be sacked.
  • craigy Staff 24 Feb 2015 13:58:34 9,500 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    It's not a rating system -- it's a recommendation system. In the case of The Order, the game was neither given a recommendation, nor was it designated as something that should be avoided. Seems pretty clear to me.
  • Rivuzu 24 Feb 2015 14:20:28 18,424 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Guys, stop whining about the lack of numbers and just accept it for what it is.

    A chance for EG towers to waffle verbose with similes and witty metaphors about a game whilst completely missing the point of giving it a review on how it plays, what it achieves and what it lacks, and recline on their mountain of swank whilst sipping G&T's from a fairy's excavated skull.

    Article in question? Sunless Sea review.
  • cov 24 Feb 2015 14:20:53 2,524 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    You know when a friend asks you whether they should get a game and you say it depends what you like - that's it.

    E.g. it's not the great sort of game it doesnt matter what type of game a person likes (it's essential all people should play it), its not the sort you would recommend because it has good enough elements most people would like, and its not the sort you would say you avoid it because it's very unlikely anyone could like it
  • himmatsj 24 Feb 2015 15:05:59 2 posts
    Seen 5 years ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Guys, I think it is pointless to attach a number to the current tags, since some 8/10 games could possibly get Essential tags and some 9/10 only Recommended.

    Regardless, I think this is how it should look like most of the time:

    8.5-10 = Essential
    7-8.5 = Recommended
    4-7 = Silence of the Lambs
    1-4 = Avoid
  • PazJohnMitch 24 Feb 2015 15:21:07 17,276 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    Essential is the reviewer saying it is an excellent game and they think everyone should try it.

    Recommended is saying I think this is good. Why do you not take a look, you might like it too.

    Avoid is the reviewer suggested a game is painful to play and should be avoided as there are better alternatives.


    The ungraded bit in the middle is the reviewer suggesting that you make your own decision based on the text. Games in this section will be loved by some and hated by others. Therefore the reader needs to make an decision based on the information they have been given to predict how they will find the game.

    Edited by PazJohnMitch at 15:21:18 24-02-2015
  • Not-a-reviewer 24 Feb 2015 15:34:10 7,686 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    They've changed from reviews to buying guides.
  • Deleted user 24 February 2015 15:52:41
    What's the difference?
  • Not-a-reviewer 24 Feb 2015 16:36:00 7,686 posts
    Seen 1 week ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    One tells people to part with money, the other tells you the writer likes it.
  • Rivuzu 24 Feb 2015 16:41:00 18,424 posts
    Seen 8 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    This is like going from Metric back to Imperial. No wonder people are struggling.
  • sanctusmortis 27 Feb 2015 12:48:20 9,914 posts
    Seen 3 weeks ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    I can't see the new scores, which is bizarre. Chrome just isn't loading them, no matter what I do with AdBlock etc.
  • DreadedWalrus 27 Feb 2015 16:11:58 1,824 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    Are you saying you don't see the badges in the reviews that have them?

    Recommended
    Essential
    Avoid
  • Deleted user 7 March 2015 18:07:38
    Here's a strange thing... Don't know if it's already been mentioned here - 20 pages is a lot to trawl through.

    Google "Dynasty Warriors 8 Empires review" and up comes the Eurogamer review, "5 days ago" - with "Rating: 3" (as in 3/5)

    It seems someone at Google is translating Eurogamer's "scoreless" reviews into a score-out-of-5. Curious.
  • Deleted user 7 March 2015 18:35:48
    They're aware of that. It was mentioned in the original front page post about it.
  • Deleted user 7 March 2015 18:38:09
    I think it's kind of crazy that you're not allowed to post a score in the comments. I got banned for a day for posting a score in a few reviews.
  • mothercruncher 7 Mar 2015 18:49:15 19,475 posts
    Seen 22 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    You're not allowed to guess at what number the review would given prior to the change?
    What the totalitarian actual?
  • Deleted user 7 March 2015 18:57:19
    Apparently so. Je suis Charlie.
  • Deleted user 2 April 2015 07:46:31
    @EatShitAndLive badges are only for exceptionally good or bad games. Anything in between is undeserved. having said that the idea of the review is to have people actually read it
  • CosmicFuzz 2 Apr 2015 07:59:48 32,632 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    @EatShitAndLive because not every game will get a badge. If every game got a badge it would essentially still be giving it a score. So most games won't. If it's amazing, or awful, or recommended to try, it'll get one.
  • Deleted user 2 April 2015 09:59:44
    @EatShitAndLive FYI Xenoblade - game is great port not so much.

    For me, i haven't played the game before so am buying the 3ds version
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.