| I held the door open for her a few years back not knowing who she was and I'm a polite fella. Didn't say thanks. So this snoopers thing is nothing compared to cuntery she's capable of. |
Snooper's Charter - it's been passed
•
Page 12
-
rockavitch 1,303 posts
Seen 56 minutes ago
Registered 11 years ago -
Dirtbox 92,595 posts
Seen 17 hours ago
Registered 19 years ago -
Shivoa 6,314 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 20 years agoDuffking wrote:
I mean, of course they have to lie in court. You can't let the "enemy" (see anyone the Gov may want to accuse in open court) know your tactical capabilities. So clearly you need to lie about how you knew something or why your "random" searches look a lot like ideological purges by the secret police.
Have we done the act essentially allowing the Government to lie in court?
What poison tree? Suppression of political opponents by a paranoid state? Who said fascism?
Edited by Shivoa at 14:26:59 07-12-2016 -
Psychotext 70,652 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 15 years agoNothing to fear, no-where to hide. -
Shivoa 6,314 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 20 years agoI do love the detail that it may be illegal to make a defence that the state is lying (aka telling the truth). Really gives this the full colour of a fascists dictatorship that has destroyed the courts and so the rule of law.
Anyway, a reminder to any citizens that if you are ever in a jury for a criminal case you must acquit. The state no longer offers a credible position from which you can make a conviction. Any convictions after this date that do not include a defence that the evidence of the state is false is a failure of justice and the convicted is a political prisoner. -
Psychotext 70,652 posts
Seen 1 day ago
Registered 15 years agoSo... I mean we assume that we can trust the police with this information right? No?
Hundreds of corrupt cops who used police databases to identify vulnerable people for "sexual gain" were caught only after the abuse of power was reported by alleged victims, a watchdog has warned.
So yeah, we'll be fine with average wankers having access to data on us. No worries. -
Dirtbox 92,595 posts
Seen 17 hours ago
Registered 19 years ago -
Shivoa 6,314 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 20 years ago -
Load_2.0 33,582 posts
Seen 60 minutes ago
Registered 18 years agoSome good news, at least temporarily.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/snoopers-charter-eu-court-ruling-illegal-investigatory-powers-act-emails-david-davis-a7488041.html -
sport 17,064 posts
Seen 23 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoBloody EU again! Stopping us taking back control! -
RichDC 9,177 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 17 years agoSNOOPING means SNOOPING! -
LittleSparra 7,926 posts
Seen 3 years ago
Registered 6 years agoWe want the freedom to be unfree! -
FWB 56,369 posts
Seen 6 months ago
Registered 20 years agoMay will push it through if she is PM when we leave. Total cunt of a person. -
RichDC 9,177 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 17 years agoDoesn't help that David Davis who helped get it this far has decided he's no longer interested in privacy as May gave him a job. -
DFawkes 32,785 posts
Seen 13 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoNo longer interested? But he's the one who took it to EU court to try and block it, so surely he is interested in privacy? -
I want our snooping to be red white and blue -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 15 years agoThere is an irony to David Davis going to the EU for help whilst also simultaneously planning how best to leave them. -
"oh, hi Dave squared, you need our help? Sure, give me the details and I'll type it up on my invisible typewriter" -
CosmicFuzz 32,632 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 15 years agoYeah exactly 
Also, I like Dave squared. Stupid name for a stupid man. -
Not-a-reviewer 7,686 posts
Seen 4 days ago
Registered 7 years ago -
RichDC 9,177 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 17 years agoDFawkes wrote:
From the Guardian:
No longer interested? But he's the one who took it to EU court to try and block it, so surely he is interested in privacy?
Before becoming Brexit minister, Davis travelled to Luxembourg to hear the case. He argued that the British government was “treating the entire nation as suspects” by ignoring safeguards on retaining and accessing personal communications data.
Davis, one of the most vociferous critics of the state’s powers to collect data on its citizens, withdrew from the case following his ministerial appointment.
Ok, he may still be interested but just not enough to stand up against the government and do something about it any more.
Edited by RichDC at 15:08:14 21-12-2016 -
DFawkes 32,785 posts
Seen 13 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoFair enough .gif)
The article I read left that bit out, mostly likely because they're evil biased mainstream media (or some other such thing). -
chopsen 21,958 posts
Seen 13 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoCareer before principles, obviously.
May's a big fan of the new law, and she's now the PM who appointed him with a cabinet position. -
Maybe she did that so Davis wouldn't pursue opposition to the bill any further.
/tinfoil hat -
Not-a-reviewer 7,686 posts
Seen 4 days ago
Registered 7 years agoIt's a cross party opposition so him supporting it or not is too late at this stage.
Also, fuck Teresa and her paranoid obsessions. I'm just glad she didn't get in with a stronger party majority. -
PazJohnMitch 17,276 posts
Seen 15 hours ago
Registered 14 years ago@MrT
Have you been watching House of Cards?
/I am pretty sure that TV show painted career politicians in such a bad light that it helped Trump get in. (And The Westwing probably helped Obama).
Edited by PazJohnMitch at 15:44:49 21-12-2016 -
I started an Instagram last night, after a few bikini pics my snoop level will be over 9000 -
chopsen 21,958 posts
Seen 13 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoMrTomFTW wrote:
tbh I think that barely requires any tinfoil at all and probably quite likely.
Maybe she did that so Davis wouldn't pursue opposition to the bill any further.
/tinfoil hat -
Technoishmatt 5,365 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoIt's really not that complicated. David Davis dropping his participation in the case is fairly simple - if you are in the government you can't take personal action against it. Instead you would try to influence from the inside. He will still believe that position I am sure.
I think the funnier aspect is that in his current day job as Brexit Minister he is trying to get out from under the rule of those pesky European courts - the ones that in this case were the only way he could get what he wanted. -
Don't we think that the role is a poisoned chalice and May is attempting to get retribution by placing him in it and hoping that he fails?
.gif)
The article I read left that bit out, mostly likely because they're evil biased mainstream media (or some other such thing). 
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
