Following Snooper's Charter - it's been passed Page 3

  • disusedgenius 5 Nov 2015 12:07:44 10,677 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    Acidizer wrote:
    Hate waiting in line at the petrol station. All these knobs paying with credit card, holding up the line for minutes at a time each, when all I need is literally 2 seconds. Approach, hand over cash, pivot, outta there.
    You guys don't have contactless yet then? That's even quicker than cash.
  • chopsen 5 Nov 2015 12:13:26 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Exactly. Bloody luddites, waiting in line, counting out cash, waiting for change.
  • chopsen 5 Nov 2015 12:20:45 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    While flashing a wodge of cash every time you need to pay for anything foreveryone to see screams safety, and nobody ever steals money. Or makes you look like a pikey cash-in-hand tax dodging scumbag.

    I was stood behind a complete twat at a bar the other day. Paying for the round he got a massive wodge of 20s and 50s. Loud mouth arsehole that made sure *everybody* knew he was buying a massive round, and could hear the *hilarious* anecdotes he had.
  • Sharz 5 Nov 2015 12:26:56 2,121 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    disusedgenius wrote:
    Acidizer wrote:
    Hate waiting in line at the petrol station. All these knobs paying with credit card, holding up the line for minutes at a time each, when all I need is literally 2 seconds. Approach, hand over cash, pivot, outta there.
    You guys don't have contactless yet then? That's even quicker than cash.
    To be fair contactless has a limit,  generally it's £15 or £20 a day.  Something you can easily go over filling a car.

    I do use it when possible, entering a pin is so old now.
  • chopsen 5 Nov 2015 12:27:09 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    You saying tax dogers don't work cash-in-hand and pay for things in cash? They're not going to put all that money in a bank account are they? Makes it too easy for HMRC to ask arkward questions it if they get investigated
  • MrTomFTW Moderator 5 Nov 2015 12:28:38 47,501 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    @Sharz It's been bumped up to £30 now. I love it, I wish more places did contactless.
  • chopsen 5 Nov 2015 12:29:49 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    What I wish we had more of is pay at the pump petrol stations. Do they really make that much money off impulse chocolate purchases?
  • DaM 5 Nov 2015 12:32:16 17,729 posts
    Seen 51 minutes ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Sharz wrote:
    disusedgenius wrote:
    Acidizer wrote:
    Hate waiting in line at the petrol station. All these knobs paying with credit card, holding up the line for minutes at a time each, when all I need is literally 2 seconds. Approach, hand over cash, pivot, outta there.
    You guys don't have contactless yet then? That's even quicker than cash.
    To be fair contactless has a limit,  generally it's £15 or £20 a day.  Something you can easily go over filling a car.

    I do use it when possible, entering a pin is so old now.
    I think it's per transaction, not per day. Also, individual retailers can accept more if they want - eg there is no limit in the Apple Store for Apple Pay. Which ironically was the only place I've had difficulty with it on my watch....
  • Load_2.0 5 Nov 2015 12:33:29 33,582 posts
    Seen 1 hour ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    I am waiting for the first big contactless security flaw to be exploited. Will get on board on a year or two.

    Always like to have cash in the wallet. Makes life a bit easier.
  • DaM 5 Nov 2015 12:33:30 17,729 posts
    Seen 51 minutes ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    chopsen wrote:
    What I wish we had more of is pay at the pump petrol stations. Do they really make that much money off impulse chocolate purchases?
    I've seen a few....Shell have also got a QR code app thing, which I've signed up for and not used.
  • Dougs 5 Nov 2015 12:46:47 100,414 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    My local Tesco station has pay at the pump (for all those clubcard goodies..). It's much easier. Except when fuckers use the pay at the pump pumps and then still go in to pay. Grrr.
  • Whizzo 5 Nov 2015 13:07:21 44,810 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    How times change.
  • AceGrace 5 Nov 2015 15:08:34 3,464 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 11 years ago
    I always pay cash where possible especially petrol stations. Just asking for your card to be cloned.
  • Deleted user 5 November 2015 15:59:22
    I assume the reason why supermarkets have pay at pump more than the normal filling stations is because 'petrol' is a loss leader for them, which in turn squeezes price for (say) BP which will come out of the forecourt owners pocket.

    I read somewhere that the forecourts make many times more profit on a bottle of water than they do a tank of fuel. It's like McDonalds, famously referred to by economists as a 'Coke reseller that also makes hamburgers' due to their big profit leader
  • mothercruncher 5 Nov 2015 17:37:14 19,474 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    chopsen wrote:
    I was stood behind a complete twat at a bar the other day. Paying for the round he got a massive wodge of 20s and 50s. Loud mouth arsehole that made sure *everybody* knew he was buying a massive round, and could hear the *hilarious* anecdotes he had.
    You lightweight- I once had to wait whilst my friend spent his 50p pocket money on 100 c a r e f u l l y c o u n t e d half-penny sweets from the jar.
  • Dirtbox 5 Nov 2015 18:24:02 92,595 posts
    Seen 17 hours ago
    Registered 19 years ago
    Post deleted
  • mothercruncher 11 Nov 2015 22:50:38 19,474 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Fantastic- our bills will go up to pay for the government's spy program.

    http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/11/broadband-bills-increase-snoopers-charter-investigatory-powers-bill-mps-warned?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech

    Hopefully, this'll be the thing that makes people give a shit.
  • RobAnybody 12 Nov 2015 09:37:09 2,892 posts
    Seen 3 days ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    What a farce.
  • Dougs 12 Nov 2015 09:38:57 100,414 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    ISPs are getting in early, this isn't even the Bill scrutiny committee!
  • Not-a-reviewer 12 Nov 2015 09:53:37 7,686 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Is there anyone involved in writing this with technical knowledge?
  • chopsen 12 Nov 2015 09:56:15 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Bugger technical knowledge. The idea someone that represents a serious terrorist threat is going to be sat at home, connected to the internet via an unencrypted connection via their ISP googling "jihadi bomb attack" or whatever it laughable.
  • President_Weasel 12 Nov 2015 10:18:26 12,355 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    chopsen wrote:
    Bugger technical knowledge. The idea someone that represents a serious terrorist threat is going to be sat at home, connected to the internet via an unencrypted connection via their ISP googling "jihadi bomb attack" or whatever it laughable.
    While I don't support this bill in any way, that's a bit disingenuous. You don't really need to be a "serious terrorist threat" to be dangerous. There's no way this is going to catch Sir Roger Al Quaeda, but it might catch a couple of shit wits before they beat the odds, actually go through with something, don't blow themselves up making bathtub explosives, and actually kill some people.

    And all we have to do to lessen the already small chance of this happening is to live in a benthamite panopticon with government snoops constantly looking over our shoulders. Where do I sign up?
  • Not-a-reviewer 12 Nov 2015 10:26:24 7,686 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 7 years ago
    Hundreds of millions of pounds, massive amounts of data that someone will want to hack into and the invasion of privacy of the entire country.

    To catch a couple of people? There are so many other indicators someone is up to something and how many have we missed that this would have caught? (Given the number of attacks, the answer is zero)
  • chopsen 12 Nov 2015 10:27:04 21,958 posts
    Seen 13 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Which is fine if mass surveillance worked, but it doesn't.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26801-mass-surveillance-not-effective-for-finding-terrorists/

    My example is a little bit facetious, but there's theoretical and observational arguments about why it's ineffective.

    However, it does fit the criteria of "something must be done, this is something doable, do it." Outcomes be damned.
  • Dougs 12 Nov 2015 10:41:10 100,414 posts
    Seen 16 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    This ultimately is about being able to access the conversations some might have over things like WhatsApp and FaceBook messenger.
  • Smeggly 12 Nov 2015 10:45:25 429 posts
    Seen 5 years ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    Sharz wrote:
    disusedgenius wrote:
    Acidizer wrote:
    Hate waiting in line at the petrol station. All these knobs paying with credit card, holding up the line for minutes at a time each, when all I need is literally 2 seconds. Approach, hand over cash, pivot, outta there.
    You guys don't have contactless yet then? That's even quicker than cash.
    To be fair contactless has a limit,  generally it's £15 or £20 a day.  Something you can easily go over filling a car.

    I do use it when possible, entering a pin is so old now.
    It's £30 per transaction.
  • DodgyPast 12 Nov 2015 19:49:05 9,353 posts
    Seen 7 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Dougs wrote:
    This ultimately is about being able to access the conversations some might have over things like WhatsApp and FaceBook messenger.
    Really Cameron just wants to be able to check if his wife's cheating on him.
  • mothercruncher 27 Nov 2015 23:22:49 19,474 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    The UK government literally does not understand how the internet works.
    Glaringly obvious flaws pointed out by an ISP boss. Most comical of all is that they're not going to require small ISP's to log at all, a tiny hole in their surveillance master plan doncha think?
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.