 Official Site Personal Stat Tracker EG Players Symthic.com - Weapon stats Edited by Ron_Justice at 09:12:51 04-11-2016 |
Battlefield 1
-
Ron_Justice 3,251 posts
Seen 3 weeks ago
Registered 11 years ago -
samharper 1,124 posts
Seen 20 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoBFBC3 would be the dream, but only if it has a decent campaign. Otherwise, I don't really care as long as the MP is good. -
Doomspoon 3,040 posts
Seen 4 days ago
Registered 14 years agoAhead of the news of the announcement I was talking to people recently about the possibility of Bad Company 3. I think in previous interviews DICE had said they were never quite sure what it was people liked so much about the Bad Company games, as in specifically why those over the regular BF series. Suggesting that if they knew specifically what it was people wanted, they'd focus on that aspect within a new game. Here's one such article.
I'd seen that over the last year on the Facebook page there was the odd screenshot or comment pertaining to Bad Company 2. It seems they wanted to keep people aware of the Bad Company branding at least.
Personally I prefer Battlefield 3 and 4 to Bad Company 2. I merely found Bad Company 2 'ok' but I'd not played much of previous BF games at the time and the 360 game was really tainted by glitching and everyone wanting to be a sniper. As someone that didn't play with a regular group of friends it just wasn't fun to play. I also couldn't give a toss about the campaign and didn't like nor see the point of the team, Body; Doyle; Tiger; The Jewellery Man or whatever the hell their names were? But I guess some people loved all that.
That said, I'd be interested in any new Battlefield as long as it wasn't another Hardline.
Edited by Doomspoon at 11:48:38 02-05-2016 -
rudedudejude 2,374 posts
Seen 23 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoBattlefield 2143 will be their next release, it's been hinted for aaaaaaaages. -
MatMan562 3,470 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 11 years agoDespite really enjoying BF3 and 4 (played 10 days worth of the BF4 mp) I still have fondest memories of Bad Company 2... but I couldn't really tell you why. There were some aspects that, even if the next game isn't a Bad Company title, they should definitely re-introduce from BC. Namely, fully-destructive environments (I remember one area in particular in BC2 that started as a nice little town but by the end of the match it was nearly always completely flattened), the objective in Rush being subject to damage so the attackers have more options to take it and more differentiated classes.
If this reveal is for Bad Company 3 I will be very excited, if it's just for Battlefield 5... I'll still be excited!
Is there any possibility of it being 2143? A couple years ago I was expecting it to come at some point, but now they have Battlefront I kind of doubt it. -
Ron_Justice 3,251 posts
Seen 3 weeks ago
Registered 11 years ago@rudedudejude Of all the possibilities, it's this I fear the most. I love a Sci-Fi movie / book but for some reason, I can't get invested in SCi-Fi shooters. Destiny made a decent go of it, but for me, it eventually fell flat.
I think part of it, for me, is the blank page. They could do virtually anything, with regards to guns, locations, ammunition, vehicles etc. But I can't relate to running around 'Future City One' shooting my laser blaster. Of course, if it works, none of that matters and I guess that's the challenge.
I think with BattleFront being a thing and that DICE seem to revel in making 'real' worlds in video games, they'll not do Future warfare. Too much extrapolation from existing and not enough 'lets go and shoot some guns and record the sounds' -
Ron_Justice 3,251 posts
Seen 3 weeks ago
Registered 11 years ago -
Dirtbox 92,595 posts
Seen 13 hours ago
Registered 19 years ago -
HisDudness 1,760 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 11 years agoDirtbox wrote:
Rubberbandingfield
It's going to be DICEd to shit and basically unplayable for at least a year after release so I wouldn't bother getting excited yet. -
Derblington 35,161 posts
Seen 15 hours ago
Registered 17 years ago^ Wolfenstein, essentially. -
Ron_Justice 3,251 posts
Seen 3 weeks ago
Registered 11 years agoI'm hearing alternate time line WW1 rumors. Can't see it. I can't see DICE doing anything 'other worldly' with the Battlefield name attached.
It'll either be a straight up BF3, BF4, BF5 story arc or and this is mental talk really, it'll be 'Battlefield' - a 3 year project to rival Destiny with 5 Themed DLC. The core (the first 6-8 months) will be WW1. The 2nd will be WW2. 3rd = BFBC3. 4th a BF5 arc. 5th BF2143. Cloud cuckoo... -
Ruckly 1,066 posts
Seen 5 years ago
Registered 7 years agoI want BC3 but I did really enjoy Titanfall. But yeah, Battlefield is more about realism and squad tactics and vehicles. They don't need a hook or an angle, and if anything it seems like people would be sick of futuristic bollocks now.
Just make BC3. If they want to fuck about maybe instead of different maps have different eras, so a rotation of Vietnam, WW2, Modern. But with all the building destructability, small fast paced levels - maybe keep it at 32 players - and none of that jet shit. -
Tryhard 12,014 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 11 years agoI wonder if it's all linked to this?
-
FWB 56,369 posts
Seen 6 months ago
Registered 20 years agoThe aircraft in BF1942 were great. Best of the series IMHO. -
Derblington 35,161 posts
Seen 15 hours ago
Registered 17 years ago@Tryhard
BC is essentially a separate sub-franchise within BF. They don't mix. -
Tryhard 12,014 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 11 years agoBad Company 3 off the list. Confirmed. 
-
FWB 56,369 posts
Seen 6 months ago
Registered 20 years agoTiger tank, Derbs. Tiger tank. -
OllyJ 4,866 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 17 years agoI think it will be conflicts across different eras...WW1/WW2/Modern/Future
No way they would do JUST WW2, even though i'd fucking love that. -
Tryhard 12,014 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 11 years agoOllyJ wrote:
Maybe in campaign, but that would not work in MP. Would be too much work and balancing.
I think it will be conflicts across different eras...WW1/WW2/Modern/Future
No way they would do JUST WW2, even though i'd fucking love that. -
OllyJ 4,866 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 17 years agoI don't know, it would be like deadliest warriors!! -
shamblemonkee 17,967 posts
Seen 3 days ago
Registered 17 years agoAlternative history WW1/2 then if the codename eagle stuff is to be beleived? -
Rivuzu 18,424 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 15 years ago2142 wasn't that bad in terms of "futurism". It didn't have much, if any, in the way of the nonsense COD has pulled out. It still had the same core gameplay, but some interesting additions like the flying bases and whatnot.
I wouldn't mind a 2143 frankly.
Of course the other theory right now is dinosaurs, which um, sure? -
Tryhard 12,014 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 11 years agoCould we see something like this?
-
OllyJ 4,866 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 17 years agoSomething like Turning Point: Fall of Liberty.
I think a WW1 setting makes sense, then at least they can move forwards again, not mad into a sci fi setting for battlefield. Though that picture looks ace. -
Rivuzu 18,424 posts
Seen 2 days ago
Registered 15 years agoPretty much.
Walkers instead of tanks. Moving home bases rather than out of bounds bases. Some other bits.
Edit: I hope it isn't WW1. In terms of warfare, and how that can be turned into a game, there really wasn't that much at the time.
Edited by Rivuzu at 12:46:43 06-05-2016 -
Tryhard 12,014 posts
Seen 4 years ago
Registered 11 years agoAttacking a large mech with a biplane.
It could melt the internet. -
I think we're going to be seeing WWI but a focus on the more experimental warfare going on then. So in the game (and campaign) we'll have:
-Bi/Triplane fights against the Red Baron. They'll have machine guns and hand-thrown grenades.
- Early tanks that can bridge over the trenches. They'll be incredibly hard to put down but not do as much damage and be slower to fire than what we're used to
- machine gun placements - wouldn't really be wwI without that, I don't think we'll be running around with automatic weapons though, making these more important.
- Tunnels and mines - I think this could be the big new exciting feature. Terrain deformation as seen in Red Faction 1 - we can dig underneath the enemy position and carry huge explosives, then destroy their trenches.
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
