Assault on the machine gun: a probabilistic approach • Page 2
-
Dirtbox 92,595 posts
Seen 16 hours ago
Registered 19 years ago -
It's an ecumenical matter. -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agophAge wrote:
It's the scope function. We can considering a positive result when soldier arrives at the postation of machine gun
Sir_Stefansen wrote:
And why is an assault only deemed successful if a soldier reaches distance zero?
phAge wrote:
And in fact I took into account a distance L from 1.000 m. Probably also too far
Sir_Stefansen wrote:
That and the fact that the lethal range of a machinegun (any machinegun) extends far beyond 50 metres.
Your is an interesting question.
You say: but I saw the Normandy, or the battles in the Flandres during WWI, and Stefansen's model suggests that to take a machine gun it need 20.000 men (0,005% means that 5 surviovor men on 100.000, 1 on 20.000), but the experience tells me different. What wrong?????????
Nothing. It's just a matter of point of view.
My model says if you run against a machine gun that are shooting against you, if you are in this situation, you survive only 1 times on 20.000.
But this first step take into account you are only against the machine gun. During an operation there are several men. The defensor aims to one man by time, and the he tries to hit him with a probability P until he kills him and then he pass to another man. So the probably that you sourvive are made by two component, the first Q (just talked about), and a second component, we can call it C, the probably that the defensor chooses to aim you
Are the attackers unarmed? -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agoDirtbox wrote:
What what?
M2 Brownings with a scope attached were used as high powered sniper rifles in the Korean war and had an effective range of 2.25km.
Now what?
If the setting changes, the parameters change. Where is the problem? -
Your-Mother 8,172 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoWe can considering a positive result if you throw yourself off a bridge. -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agoYour-Mother wrote:
Oh Sir, I'm wondering if you have studied at Oxford or Cambridge
We can considering a positive result if you throw yourself off a bridge. -
Your-Mother 8,172 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoAny bridge will do. -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agoYour-Mother wrote:
Ok, you're the usual fanatic looking for glory, like those people during a live tv that put theirself beyond the journalist and greet with the hand
Any bridge will do. -
Your-Mother 8,172 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoIf there's no nearby bridge then perhaps a busy road will suffice. -
What a fucking owl this guy is, eh Stef -
neilka 24,021 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoI assume "greet with the hand" is an Italian euphemism. -
No Italian man has ever been able to remove either of his hands from his genitals, and even if they did, I wouldn't want to touch his hand -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agoWhat's happened to Pes? -
neilka 24,021 posts
Seen 6 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoDon't look now but
he's
behind
you -
DaM 17,729 posts
Seen 10 minutes ago
Registered 20 years agoHe tried to refute your new theory in practice.....failed 
Turns out your hypothesis is correct. -
Sir_Stefansen 582 posts
Seen 2 weeks ago
Registered 6 years agoI'm improving the model. And it is proving very loyal to reality. Soon new results -
Sir_Stefansen wrote:
How you getting on with this? Or has music taken a priority?
I'm improving the model. And it is proving very loyal to reality. Soon new results
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
