Bloobat wrote:Someone's still making gender fluid jokes in 2018. How embarrassing. Love the people complaining over a lack of historical accuracy that could harm the authenticity of the story being told. Since when has DICE ever made a single player campaign worth a damn? |
Battlefield 5
•
Page 3
-
Tuffty 4,770 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 14 years ago -
Technoishmatt 4,876 posts
Seen 30 minutes ago
Registered 7 years agoyeah, I thought it was nice to have a trailer that actually does cover the fast pace of MP. “historically accurate” is like no mainstream FPS ever. -
Technoishmatt 4,876 posts
Seen 30 minutes ago
Registered 7 years ago -
JoelStinty 9,199 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 7 years agoThat was a good trailer. Like they decided and realised that battlefield is a computer game and made it as gamey as possible. If that makes sense -
mothercruncher 18,727 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 14 years agoThat trailer was like a toddler smashing toys together. -
Huggybear 1,806 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 18 years agoSo there's a woman in a trench coat with a robotic arm and blue face paint. And a dude that looks like a cross between Kratos and a biker with a tank top and a neck tattoo.
Why?
Because EA needs to make a buck. People have said no to Premium Passes and Lootboxes, so monetisation through customisation is all they could think of.
So you'll be able to play as a black dude with a samurai top knot and a Dali moustache who does the dab and the moonwalk. Which is ok in Fortnite, but will probably look spectacularly out of place in a WW2 Battlefield game... and how many times did they say "immersive" in that reveal?
Kind of hoping it is actually some kind of alternate history thing like Wolfenstein, but I doubt it.
Ultimately gameplay is kind of course, but I can't remember the last time a reveal trailer killed all hype for me quite like this. -
y2rich 3,501 posts
Seen 3 months ago
Registered 14 years agoThe trailer was utterly mental and I loved it. Gone from 'not fussed' to 'yeah I'll play that' in 3 minutes -
Daz190uk 450 posts
Seen 7 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoIt’s Battlefield with some incremental changes.
They may be good, they may be bad - the animations are hard to say until you “feel” the changes.
I like the sound of some of the Tides of War stuff and that there’s no premium pass to split the community.
I like Battlefield so looking forward to playing it. -
Carlo 21,567 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 16 years agoy2rich wrote:
I have to say I'm the same now. Just need to decide if I'm going console or PC for this.
The trailer was utterly mental and I loved it. Gone from 'not fussed' to 'yeah I'll play that' in 3 minutes -
jimnastics 1,867 posts
Seen 7 days ago
Registered 10 years agoCan't say the trailer did anything for me at all... but the 20min gameplay video did. I'm in.
-
Frogofdoom 17,223 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 9 years agoA little less snipey would be nice. I will pick it up though, the no season pass bit pleases me no end. -
Tonka 31,562 posts
Seen 10 hours ago
Registered 17 years agoReminds me of the Killzone trailer. -
Dgzter 3,516 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 12 years agoI'm sure it'll be pretty great to be honest, but certainly gives me an excuse to pass on it at launch.
I really love BF1: I bought the Season Pass and I've sank over 100 hours into it in the seventeen months since launch, which is fairly unheard of for me and makes it one of only four games in the last five years that I've invested so much time into (the others being Dark Souls, Elite: Dangerous and WoW).
So for me personally, and only based off the cursory look we've had so far, it comes across as just too much of a conservative iteration on BF1 to elicit much enthusiasm at this stage.
I also didn't particularly like the tone of that trailer. I think BF1 did a fairly decent job of conveying appropriate solemnity within the obviously over-the-top bombastic context of a modern-gen FPS, or at least as well as can be expected (certain ill-judged social media posts from DICE being the exception). But the buddy-buddy interaction and dialogue there was fucking cringe-worthy, and should have been sense-checked with a functioning adult before going to press.
Edited by Dgzter at 09:16:41 24-05-2018 -
Decks 28,427 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 5 years agojimnastics wrote:
I honestly would have thought that was gameplay from BF1 if I didn't know. The talk of BC2 destruction is the only thing that's got me kind of interested.
Can't say the trailer did anything for me at all... but the 20min gameplay video did. I'm in.
-
solidsneek 763 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 5 years agoI love how colorful and bright it looks. At first I thought it was some guerrilla warfare setting a bit like home-front. Why does one of the guy's have a Katana on his back? I really like the look of it although I have found Battlefield 1 hit and miss. -
Rogueywon 10,707 posts
Seen 2 hours ago
Registered 15 years agoWonder what the cash cow this time around is? There's no season pass and no loot boxes (both officially confirmed).
So that means either a £100 price tag or... energy bar! It's going to be an energy bar, isn't it? "Wait 3 hours for ammo to regenerate or buy 300 crystals now!". -
Huggybear 1,806 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 18 years agoDecks wrote:
It is BF1 gameplay, He's just talking about BF5 with BF1 gameplay in the background.
jimnastics wrote:
I honestly would have thought that was gameplay from BF1 if I didn't know. The talk of BC2 destruction is the only thing that's got me kind of interested.
Can't say the trailer did anything for me at all... but the 20min gameplay video did. I'm in.
-
Decks 28,427 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 5 years agoHah, really? I just skipped through it with the sound off. -
solidsneek 763 posts
Seen 2 years ago
Registered 5 years agoWomen didn't fight in world war 2 did they btw? -
Dgzter 3,516 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 12 years agoDecks wrote:
Totally what I did as well lol
Hah, really? I just skipped through it with the sound off. -
y2rich 3,501 posts
Seen 3 months ago
Registered 14 years ago@solidsneek women didn't even exist back then -
Huggybear 1,806 posts
Seen 5 hours ago
Registered 18 years agosolidsneek wrote:
They did in some armies. Russian, at least. In small numbers though, and specific tasks.
Women didn't fight in world war 2 did they btw?
Edited by Huggybear at 09:34:25 24-05-2018 -
Dgzter 3,516 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 12 years ago@Rogueywon Don't worry Roguey, you'll be able to purchase your much-coveted hipster beard. We all know how you love them!
Really cool to see diet-Kratos with the totes sick ink in there as well! Will hopefully educate younger generations on just how fucking cool WW2 really was. -
minky-kong 14,674 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 13 years agosolidsneek wrote:
Revisionist history says they did. With blue facepaint and robotic arms.
Women didn't fight in world war 2 did they btw? -
JamboWayOh 22,460 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 8 years agoDgzter wrote:
Bloody hell let it go.
@Rogueywon Don't worry Roguey, you'll be able to purchase your much-coveted hipster beard. We all know how you love them!
Really cool to see diet-Kratos with the totes sick ink in there as well! Will hopefully educate younger generations on just how fucking cool WW2 really was. -
Dgzter 3,516 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 12 years ago@JamboWayOh I'm not really being serious bud, slow start to the work day here is all .gif)
-
@Dgzter
Hmmmmm, I got my eye on you. It's alright I'm just getting a bit annoyed with the large amount of people on other sites complaining that there's a woman and black guy in the trailer which makes it not historically accurate, because obviously bf is a simulation and not a backdrop for you to do crazy shit.
Edited by JamboWayOh at 09:44:21 24-05-2018
.gif)
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.
