Ghostbusters 3 - Directed by Jason Reitman (2020)

    First Previous
  • beastmaster 16 Jan 2019 16:26:37 19,255 posts
    Seen 12 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    It's legit. Top secret project now not secret,

    News here

    Teaser trailer here.

  • BinaryBob101 16 Jan 2019 16:33:54 26,903 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Hmmmm, no Bill Murray confirmation. I bet Ackroyd will be gagging for it, he has been for aeons.

    Torch pass to kids. Fuck that. More remember this crap.
  • oceanmotion 16 Jan 2019 16:35:41 17,358 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Surely a Halloween release would be better instead of summer.

    So, who retired to a farm and kids found stuff.
  • ZuluHero 16 Jan 2019 16:36:17 7,446 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 13 years ago
    Maybe Harold Ramis will be a CGI ghost?
  • oceanmotion 16 Jan 2019 16:38:05 17,358 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Kinda reminded me of that barn in Back to the Future, is it really the Back to the Future remake?
  • Load_2.0 16 Jan 2019 16:39:21 29,507 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    ZuluHero wrote:
    Maybe Harold Ramis will be a CGI ghost?
    The raping ghost. Like the one that pleasured Dan Ackroyd.
  • BinaryBob101 16 Jan 2019 16:44:22 26,903 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    At least there's no sign of women.
  • neilka 16 Jan 2019 16:46:41 22,559 posts
    Seen 7 minutes ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    I'm going to make a bold first page prediction that this is going to be rubbish.
  • challenge_hanukkah 16 Jan 2019 16:47:32 10,908 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    He directed Juno which was nice.
  • BinaryBob101 16 Jan 2019 16:52:45 26,903 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Quirky indie is pretty much his thing.
  • Decks Best Forumite, 2016 16 Jan 2019 17:03:56 20,121 posts
    Seen 23 seconds ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    neilka wrote:
    I'm going to make a bold first page prediction that this is going to be rubbish.
    I'll go further and day it will be even worse than the one with all those ghastly vaginas in.
  • challenge_hanukkah 16 Jan 2019 17:06:22 10,908 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    A bold, but probably impossible statement.
  • Deleted user 16 January 2019 17:17:38
    I watched the front runner the other night. Was pretty good.

    This can't be any worse than the last one.
  • SnackPlissken 16 Jan 2019 17:56:54 1,021 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    Just waiting for the announcement of Danny McBride to be part of the new Ghostbusters.
  • freddymercurystwin 16 Jan 2019 19:35:20 1,658 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    I quite liked the last one. I think the first one is dreadfully dated and really a bit shit. The second one is unwatchable.
  • Load_2.0 16 Jan 2019 19:47:18 29,507 posts
    Seen 5 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Decks wrote:
    neilka wrote:
    I'm going to make a bold first page prediction that this is going to be rubbish.
    I'll go further and day it will be even worse than the one with all those ghastly vaginas in.
    That's where ghosts come from.
  • djronz. 16 Jan 2019 20:02:23 421 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    After seeing who's directing and looking at the teaser I'm actually pretty hopeful for this. (although it could equally be shit)
  • up_the_ante 16 Jan 2019 20:29:33 1,059 posts
    Seen 60 minutes ago
    Registered 12 years ago
    If the film's as good as the trailer it should be alright. And yes that is totally the Back to the future barn.
  • JamboWayOh 16 Jan 2019 20:30:22 13,628 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    neilka wrote:
    I'm going to make a bold first page prediction that this is going to be rubbish.
    Can I get some money on that bet because I'll take it.
  • Deleted user 16 January 2019 22:21:30
    freddymercurystwin wrote:
    I quite liked the last one. I think the first one is dreadfully dated and really a bit shit. The second one is unwatchable.
    It's a fucking masterpiece of a script. It may be dated (beacuse it's 25 odd years old) but it's still got more laughs on the first ten minutes than the entire runtime of the new one.

    The Feig one was fine. It wasn't funny at all, but was ok as a dumb easy watch action film.

    If you don't recognise Ghostbusters 1 as an absolute classic you must have really shit taste or be dead inside.

    Or a cunt (it's this option).

    Edited by Jyzzy-Z at 22:22:21 16-01-2019
  • freddymercurystwin 16 Jan 2019 23:05:10 1,658 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    No the first one is a bit shit. It's one of those films people like to reminise about (when half of them weren't even old enough to watch it when it was first released) with rose tinted glasses, the story is weak and really slow, the effects are outrageously awful, the jokes are 80s shit, in fact it's absolute dross now I'm thinking about it more.
  • Decks Best Forumite, 2016 16 Jan 2019 23:14:55 20,121 posts
    Seen 23 seconds ago
    Registered 4 years ago
    My little boy is obsessed with Ghostbusters so I watch it quite regularly. You're completely wrong.
  • JamboWayOh 16 Jan 2019 23:19:02 13,628 posts
    Seen 5 minutes ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    freddymercurystwin wrote:
    No the first one is a bit shit. It's one of those films people like to reminise about (when half of them weren't even old enough to watch it when it was first released) with rose tinted glasses, the story is weak and really slow, the effects are outrageously awful, the jokes are 80s shit, in fact it's absolute dross now I'm thinking about it more.
    Can we ban him now please?
  • Deleted user 16 January 2019 23:20:21
    freddymercurystwin wrote:
    No the first one is a bit shit. It's one of those films people like to reminise about (when half of them weren't even old enough to watch it when it was first released) with rose tinted glasses, the story is weak and really slow, the effects are outrageously awful, the jokes are 80s shit, in fact it's absolute dross now I'm thinking about it more.
    Stay off the spice.
  • neilka 16 Jan 2019 23:27:38 22,559 posts
    Seen 7 minutes ago
    Registered 14 years ago
    And I used to think ecosse was the worst person on the forum.
  • RGeefe 16 Jan 2019 23:31:57 345 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 8 years ago
    The entire sequence in the lift at the hotel shits all over most other modern US comedy on its own.

    Thrown in the wry sarcasm throughout the movie ("I've worked in the private sector, they expect results") and you have a genius script
  • fontgeeksogood 17 Jan 2019 04:39:51 6,242 posts
    Seen 14 minutes ago
    Registered 1 year ago
    Ghostbusters is awesome and if you don't agree you're basically siding with Gozer and are a humongous cunt.

    Ghostbusters II however was worse than Ghostbusteresses, come at me bros
  • challenge_hanukkah 17 Jan 2019 05:41:45 10,908 posts
    Seen 4 hours ago
    Registered 6 years ago
    freddymercurystwin wrote:
    No the first one is a bit shit. It's one of those films people like to reminise about (when half of them weren't even old enough to watch it when it was first released) with rose tinted glasses, the story is weak and really slow, the effects are outrageously awful, the jokes are 80s shit, in fact it's absolute dross now I'm thinking about it more.
    I hope you're just being contrary as the alternative is just too hideous to contemplate.
  • irrelevanthuman 17 Jan 2019 07:19:30 413 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 10 years ago
    Ghostbusters is always the first film I buy in any new home video format; itís a stone cold classic.
  • First Previous
Log in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.