WTF are Apple playing at? Page 7

  • tengu 8 May 2007 19:54:54 10,294 posts
    Seen 14 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Post deleted
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    What was wrong with yesterday's thread? ;p
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    I don't see the phone as an Apple phone - it's just a phone that happens to integrate with the iTMS, which is the big selling point. For Apple, the Nano is clearly the big news and that's why the phone was rolled out halfway through the speech which is how they announce the boring stuff while the Nano was kept back for 'just one more thing' at the end.

    The phone is indeed distinctly 'meh' (hence my thread yesterday), the Nano is more exciting though hardly a revolutionary leap forward from the current line-up.

    edit - oh, and... he hasn't seen Airplane?!? WTF???

    Edited by otto at 15:07:33 08-09-2005
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Khanivor wrote:
    Let's just not pretend that for the majority of their products the only thing that stands out about Apple hardware is the looks (and price), often with inferior capabilites to the competiton.
    This argument is a favourite resort of the Apple haterz. ;p Trouble is, it doesn't stand up. If Apple were all mouth and no trousers, they wouldn't have the die-hard fanboy support of so many true geeks. Yes they look nice. Yes this is important. No it's not everything. It really does boil down to the software. They're not perfect, far from it, but it's just a lame and ill-informed argument to suggest that their appeal has nothing to do with the software.
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Khanivor wrote:
    Of course, a number of style concious peeps will no doubt be slapping hacked version of Windows on Apple machines :)
    I'll certainly whack an old copy of Windows on there, just so I can play my old games. Wouldn't dream of using it for my normal working environment though. ;p
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Yeah mouse but you're also a nerd (don't deny it! don't you dare!) and the fact is, if the software and performance had been as inferior as Khanivor suggests, you'd have quickly become disenchanted, right?
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    You know I was moaning about the dullness of this last Stevenote, and yearning for some genuine blockbuster news?

    Heheh, as usual, Bob Cringely and his overactive imagination come to the rescue:

    [code]Microsoft is woefully late with its next Windows upgrade, while Apple is far ahead with even the current version of OS X. Apple is moving to Intel processors and hackers have already shown that OS X can run fine on non-Apple hardware. But Apple doesn't want to give up its profitable hardware business to compete head-to-head with Microsoft. And remember, Apple totally dominates the portable music player market and will probably sell 25 million iPods or more this year.

    Every one of those iPods is a bootable drive. What if Apple introduces OS 10.5, its next super-duper operating system release, and at the same time starts loading FOR FREE the current operating system version -- OS 10.4 -- on every new iPod in a version that runs on generic Intel boxes? What if they also make 10.4 a free download through the iTunes Music Store?

    It wouldn't kill Microsoft, but it would hurt the company, both emotionally and materially. And it wouldn't hurt Apple at all. Apple hardware sales would be driven by OS 10.5 and all giving away 10.4 would do is help sell more iPods and attract more customers to Apple's store.[/code]

    Nice idea, isn't it? :)
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    It ain't gonna happen. Lovely thought though. :)
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Khanivor wrote:
    Old tech at twice the price because it's white and got an Apple logo on it.
    Your trademark trolling on this is becoming so boring. Saying it over and over again isn't going to make it true.
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Khanivor wrote:
    Let the trhead die, eh otto, rahter then dig up a post of mine pages before the last one you replied to just to get a dig in.
    "Just to get a dig in" - right. You have an inflated idea of yourself. I apologise for the time difference - it means I read morning threads a few hours late - it's a thread I've been following - I comment on it. That's OK is it? Good.
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Evidence please that Apple prices are inflated. Most independent reports that I've read (side-by-side reviews in photography mags, generalist PC mags) say the opposite.
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.