The man locked my thread!

  • flintcheeseman 18 Nov 2005 04:22:28 30 posts
    Registered 16 years ago
    I truely am sorry that I stepped over the boundary and broke a rule set by the forum of this website and I hope Otto can forgive me for posting the name of a site that condones piracy which was mistaken for a "link" Good on ye mate.

    I would also like to mention that atleast where I come from we have this thing called freedom of speech that is referred to as a "Civil right" I don't know if you are familiar with such things but they really are nice to have.

    I do understand also that by posting in this forum that I am being given a right to speak here that can be taken away if I do not follow protocol. However, I am all for freedom of speech in my country and also on the internet.

    Having said that, if some one would be so kind to point me in the direction of a list of the fore mentioned rules, I will happily read and comply with these rules.

    On a side note, If you had actually taken the time to read some of my other threads, you would know that the reason I am talking so much about piracy is because I happen to be praring an argumentitive speech on this subject.

    No hard feelings.
    Flint Cheeseman
  • MetalDog 18 Nov 2005 07:37:37 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    /lends Flint a stepladder

    Looks like you need a hand getting over yourself, there ;)
  • mentat 18 Nov 2005 07:39:58 5,613 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Sorry, who said freedom of speech applies on this forum?

    /readys mod stick

    :D
  • Xerx3s 18 Nov 2005 07:56:42 23,970 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    mentat wrote:
    Sorry, who said freedom of speech applies on this forum?

    /readys mod stick

    :D

    Obey the fist ^_^
  • BartonFink 18 Nov 2005 07:58:29 35,268 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    That's actually a very good point Hyoshi brought up where are the forum rules gone?
  • Mike_Hunt 18 Nov 2005 07:58:43 23,524 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 19 years ago
    Hyoushi wrote:
    The man raises an interesting point. The forum ToS page seems to have vanished after the redesign, so there was no way for mr. Cheeseman to know the rules if he joined after the redesign. Which seems likely looking at his UID.

    So, gentlemen otto and mentat, you just owned yourselves again. I salute you.
    This self owning... is it a bit like strangle-wanking?

    [MH]
  • marilena 18 Nov 2005 08:08:08 8,238 posts
    Seen 1 day ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    It's true that the rules are gone, but it's also true that this forum was never governed by rules, it was always governed by common sense. And when that failed, it was governed by huge sessions of bitching and whining, which this thread will turn into in no more than two hours.

    For what it's worth, I think Otto's decision was quite reasonable. And I also appreciate the fact that he consistently posts explanations before closing a thread, which some of the other moderators fail to do at times.
  • UncleLou Moderator 18 Nov 2005 08:16:45 40,723 posts
    Seen 35 minutes ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Some rules are a matter of course and really don't need to be spelled out, but of course there'll alaways be people who complain that they smell because there was no "wipe your bottom" sign in the bathroom.

    That said, I didn't see flint's thread in question, so take it as a general remark.
  • BartonFink 18 Nov 2005 08:17:52 35,268 posts
    Seen 2 months ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    marilena wrote:
    It's true that the rules are gone, but it's also true that this forum was never governed by rules, it was always governed by common sense.
    Nope there was at one time rules that laid out quite clearly that linking to sites promoting piracy would be locked/deleted. In general though the place is self moderating (not so much anymore though) and common sense does prevail.
  • Shinji 18 Nov 2005 08:39:26 5,902 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    1) "Freedom of speech" is not an applicable concept on a privately owned and run web forum.

    2) Young master Cheeseman may not have been aware of the ruling on linking to piracy resources, which is why his post was deleted rather than his account, presumably. Seems fair to me.

    3) Er, I don't know where the forum T&Cs have gone. Peculiar. I'll check down the back of the EG sofa later.
  • djchump 18 Nov 2005 08:45:48 4,463 posts
    Seen 14 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Sticky Thread at top of forum:
    Linky

    Forum and Comments Policy:
    Comments policy

    - wasn't too hard to find.

    BTW - I'm totally with the mods on this one - they own this forum so can do what they want. There is no "freedom of speech" or "first amendment" here - it's an internet forum.
    If you're the kind of whiner that demands their freedom of speech, then set up your own internet forum - and good luck dealing with the trolls and flamers if you ain't gonna be banning people ;-)

    regards,
    dunk
  • HiddenPooh 18 Nov 2005 08:47:20 1,426 posts
    Seen 4 weeks ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Anybody even remotely familar with the 'warez' scene would and should have known that no forums allow linking to that kind of site. Even on forums devoted to the discussions of this kind of stuff it is never allowed.

    You have to conclude that the poster was either very inexperienced in these matters or just trying to piss the mods off.
  • Shinji 18 Nov 2005 08:48:14 5,902 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Oooh, well spotted dunk. We could probably do with linking that more prominently really, given how quickly we're picking up new users...

    /removes hand from back of EG sofa, stares at fingers in dismay, runs to sink and scrubs furiously...
  • djchump 18 Nov 2005 08:54:37 4,463 posts
    Seen 14 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Shinji wrote:
    Oooh, well spotted dunk. We could probably do with linking that more prominently really, given how quickly we're picking up new users...

    /removes hand from back of EG sofa, stares at fingers in dismay, runs to sink and scrubs furiously...
    It's linked in Otto's "The comments batphone" sticky.
    So maybe just making the title of that thread more obvious would do it ;-)
  • Boof 18 Nov 2005 08:57:27 418 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    It's a fair decision. All the forums I frequent have rules that ban the linking of warez because of the potential legal ramifications that the site could leave themselves open to.
  • Deleted user 18 November 2005 09:08:33
    The forum rules aren't that hard to find are they? And common sense would say that talking about piracy was a no-no.

    The freedom of speech argument is a poor one, i reckon. You want to talk about piracy? Set up your own website and do it. That's freedom of speech. Forcing other people to host your comments on their website doesn't equate to freedom of speech. What about EG's freedom? The freedom of speech doesn't come with a an obligation for others to listen to you.

    The preparing a speech on the subject get out clause - sounds a bit like Pete Townsend's 'research' into paedophile websites to me, but i'll give you the benefit of the doubt. let us know how the speech goes. Perhaps post a copy of the text.
  • Flightrisker 18 Nov 2005 09:14:10 18,139 posts
    Seen 6 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    HiddenPooh wrote:
    You have to conclude that the poster was either very inexperienced in these matters or just trying to piss the mods off.

    But he's "praring an argumentitive speech on this subject".

    Flinty, you seem like a descent sort, just cool the jet's on the torrent thing and I'm sure we'll all get along fine.

    What do you think of the Xbox 360's launch titles?

    /makes more mess for Slurpy
  • mentat 18 Nov 2005 09:16:10 5,613 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Hyoushi wrote:
    The man raises an interesting point. The forum ToS page seems to have vanished after the redesign, so there was no way for mr. Cheeseman to know the rules if he joined after the redesign. Which seems likely looking at his UID.

    So, gentlemen otto and mentat, you just owned yourselves again. I salute you.
    Hmm.

    Seems like you self owned yourself whilst attempting to own someone else there.

    Nice one! Well done.
  • Teeth 18 Nov 2005 09:59:14 7,987 posts
    Seen 10 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    To me, the post seemed like a roundabout way of advertising the piracy site more than anything else.
  • Spin_Dr_Wolf 18 Nov 2005 13:15:17 6,170 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Hyoushi wrote:
    The man raises an interesting point. The forum ToS page seems to have vanished after the redesign, so there was no way for mr. Cheeseman to know the rules if he joined after the redesign. Which seems likely looking at his UID.

    So, gentlemen otto and mentat, you just owned yourselves again. I salute you.
    Ignorance is not a defence. Also why single out two of the forumite mods as opposed to someone whop actually works for EG and has enough access to alter the site itself in anyway !?
  • Spin_Dr_Wolf 18 Nov 2005 13:16:09 6,170 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    mentat wrote:
    Sorry, who said freedom of speech applies on this forum?

    /readys mod stick

    :D
    /hits with boring normal stick

    /drives away really fast
  • GTBurns 18 Nov 2005 13:17:36 1,772 posts
    Seen 9 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    flintcheeseman wrote:
    I truely am sorry ...

    ... of the fore mentioned rules ...

    ... I happen to be praring an argumentitive speech on this subject.

    No hard feelings.
    Flint Cheeseman

    You might want to 'prare' the old grammar and spell checker before getting stuck in that speech, cheese! Though if there's anything worse than a half-arsed speech - it's a half-arsed apology!
  • Bill-Gates-is-Evil 18 Nov 2005 14:33:41 8,934 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 19 years ago
    The concept of freedom of speech does not apply when you are a GUEST on someone elses property-- i.e. you being on Eurogamer or any other website not your own. It is not a violation of your civil rights.

    If you let me into your house and I started calling you a dumbass and then you wanted me to shut up and leave, you didn't violate my right to freedom of speech, because your right to ownership and control of your own property supercedes freedom of speech.
  • morriss 18 Nov 2005 14:34:41 71,293 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    MetalDog wrote:
    /lends Flint a stepladder

    Looks like you need a hand getting over yourself, there ;)

    haven't heard that one before...nice. I like it! :)
  • otto Moderator 28 May 2007 11:16:19 49,322 posts
    Seen 4 days ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Furbs wrote:
    And finally I should point out this thread which was an ongoing discussion whilst otto was active on the forum yet wasnt even looked at - even the first post makes it pretty obvious what its about. I'm not having a go at otto here, but if theses rules are going to be applied consistently (to avoid victimising, or rather a sense of), maybe there is now too much activity for the handful of mods we have?
    Context context. Here we had a new arrival in the forum who had introduced himself by posting new threads on piracy. Both were presented as 'discussion topics' on the rights and wrongs, and the first led to an interesting and long discussion. The second, well, in my judgement it was a fairly transparent troll for a warez discussion. I and the other mods are under strict instructions from the site owners to stamp down hard on any discussion of warez. Established regulars do have more leeway in this respect than newcomers, that's a fact of life. Regs usually get the benefit of the doubt, first- or second-time posters not.
  • Furbs 14 Jun 2007 22:45:51 45,740 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Linking is a no-no...but if all discussion of it is banned (which is what it was locked for based on ottos message) then the mods are going to be busy...the "Justifications for piracy" thread is still unlocked, and imo is a very interesting discussion. The Lost Season 2 thread needs to be locked as that clearly a result of pirated material, and the Battlestar Galactica one, and the Half Life 2 Xbox one. Oh and theres a Usenet tutorial out there which lets be honest, the majority of users will use for piracy. Maybe Razz's softmod thread too? How many threads mention a no-cd patch?

    Remove the links, even take stronger action against the poster, but locking a discussion is harsh...

    The thread in question

    IIRC, it was a link to izonews or nforce(?) or an NZB hosting service which was deleted? If I'm wrong, my apologies, but as I understand it, those first two sites actually offer no illegal content?

    And finally I should point out this thread which was an ongoing discussion whilst otto was active on the forum yet wasnt even looked at - even the first post makes it pretty obvious what its about. I'm not having a go at otto here, but if theses rules are going to be applied consistently (to avoid victimising, or rather a sense of), maybe there is now too much activity for the handful of mods we have?


    Edited by Furbs at 09:35:35 18-11-2005
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.