Stupid sex question threads

    First Previous
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:21:14 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Fewer is better.
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:22:18 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    That's probably too much to hope for.
  • deem 29 Jun 2006 13:22:34 31,667 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Post deleted
  • Hunamster 29 Jun 2006 13:22:50 341 posts
    Seen 7 years ago
    Registered 15 years ago
    Whats sex?
  • Sid-Nice 29 Jun 2006 13:24:14 15,848 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Is your sn%&*$ purple; sorry better not go there I like my balls too much. :)
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:24:46
    Add to that threads about how one consistently lacks confidence and can't deal with women. Simple answer is to just grow a pair and get on with it.

    Also add to that the KOTI love threads.
  • thehat 29 Jun 2006 13:27:30 1,831 posts
    Seen 10 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Mr Sleep wrote:
    Simple answer is to just grow a pair and get on with it.

    That's a little harsh, no? Some people can only gain the confidence they need through anonynous discussion (and piss taking).

    Maybe there should be a new catagory for all the bollox so we can filter it out?
  • deem 29 Jun 2006 13:28:09 31,667 posts
    Seen 8 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Post deleted
  • smoothpete 29 Jun 2006 13:28:22 37,743 posts
    Seen 3 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Yeah I can do without them. Virgins, the lot of 'em
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:29:19 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    There is, it's this one. Trouble is, we can't filter one catagory out and people often post fluff threads in the other catagories.

    Not trying to start a flame war here, chaps, just a request for restraint so that we don't end up with a front page full of crap.
  • Sid-Nice 29 Jun 2006 13:30:17 15,848 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Said the woman who'd pose naked for £100k.
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:31:19
    Sid Nice wrote:
    Said the woman who'd pose naked for £100k.

    That was obviously a sensible thread.
  • Stickman 29 Jun 2006 13:31:31 29,986 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    I'd say serious ones were OK (although they'd be few and far between), but stuff like T.G's "Hey, I had loads of sex for ages. Aren't I great?" is just bollocks.
  • York 29 Jun 2006 13:31:52 8,667 posts
    Seen 13 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Just think of little Johnny coming on to EG for his daily dose of cuddly Nintendo news, before you post threads like that o_0
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:31:53
    thehat wrote:
    Mr Sleep wrote:
    Simple answer is to just grow a pair and get on with it.

    That's a little harsh, no?
    Yes, it is perhaps a little harsh.

    Some people can only gain the confidence they need through anonynous discussion (and piss taking).

    Maybe there should be a new catagory for all the bollox so we can filter it out?
    I'd suggest that using a public forum for airing personal and private problems is not always the best idea.

    I'd agree with deem, MSN or the like are probably a better idea, talk to people off forum that have helped you in the past would be better than the inevitable piss take that doesn't help anyone do anything other than relieve stress. Of course that doesn't work for newbies but then I'm not exaclty talking about them anyway. I've never really understood forums as a support structure.

    Edited by Mr Sleep at 13:32:54 29-06-2006
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:31:57
    Stickman wrote:
    I'd say serious ones were OK (although they'd be few and far between), but stuff like T.G's "Hey, I had loads of sex for ages. Aren't I great?" is just bollocks.

    Thread of the year, that was.
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:33:38 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    I said fewer, not none, Sid. You need to go back to troll school.
  • Stickman 29 Jun 2006 13:34:23 29,986 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    That's a good point actually, Fozzie. OK, serious ones are rubbish, ones where we get to take the piss out of T.G are fine.

    Edited by Stickman at 13:34:11 29-06-2006
  • Sid-Nice 29 Jun 2006 13:37:26 15,848 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    MetalDog wrote:
    I said fewer, not none, Sid. You need to go back to troll school.
    No there's far too many trolls on this forum already.

    But you are right, there is too many sex threads; E/G has the sex thread virus. One fucker with a cock to big for a Trojan; another with a dick like a worm, who will complain about the black hole? :)
  • Sid-Nice 29 Jun 2006 13:38:39 15,848 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    vermin wrote:
    The ones MetalDog like are a-ok. The rest, not so.
    LOL.
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:38:59
    Not being a "grammar nazi", but the whole 'fewer' 'less' thing has always confused me, but in this case I could have sworn it should have been less.

    From wiki:

    "The difference between less and fewer is that the former refers to an amount, while the latter refers to a numbered quantity of undivided items."

    So in this case you're talking about an amount no?
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:40:29
    kalel wrote:
    From wiki:
    /tuts
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:41:03
    Fozzie_bear wrote:
    Stickman wrote:
    I'd say serious ones were OK (although they'd be few and far between), but stuff like T.G's "Hey, I had loads of sex for ages. Aren't I great?" is just bollocks.

    Thread of the year, that was.

    Until some cockbag dramaqueen attention whore deleted it, anyway.
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:41:33 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Only MetalDog sanctioned threads allowed! Independant though verboten!

    /crushes forum under the iron-shod boot of opinion
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:42:08
    Gremmi wrote:
    Fozzie_bear wrote:
    Stickman wrote:
    I'd say serious ones were OK (although they'd be few and far between), but stuff like T.G's "Hey, I had loads of sex for ages. Aren't I great?" is just bollocks.

    Thread of the year, that was.

    Until some cockbag dramaqueen attention whore deleted it, anyway.

    And then all the decent follow-up threads were deleted and we were left with one that smelt.
  • thehat 29 Jun 2006 13:42:33 1,831 posts
    Seen 10 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    kalel wrote:
    Not being a "grammar nazi", but...

    :)
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:43:02
    YOU smell.
  • tentonipete 29 Jun 2006 13:43:04 508 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    it only counts if it's anal
  • York 29 Jun 2006 13:43:31 8,667 posts
    Seen 13 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    What's 3 + 1 mean?
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:43:42
    Gremmi wrote:
    YOU smell.

    No. YOU smell.

    And so did your thread!
  • First Previous
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.