Stupid sex question threads Page 2

  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:43:57
    tentonipete wrote:
    it only counts if it's anal
    Which I think we'll agree Kalel's post certainly was.
  • reality_cheque 29 Jun 2006 13:45:14 7,486 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Maybe we just need a 'sex' category, and a way to filter it out if you don't want to read it.

    But then I don't care, I like all threads that aren't about house prices in the Sudan.
  • reality_cheque 29 Jun 2006 13:46:04 7,486 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    York wrote:
    What's 3 + 1 mean?
    God, you're SO last week.



    :p
  • MetalDog 29 Jun 2006 13:47:09 24,076 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    It would be ultra great to be able to filter out specific catagories. The sports fans have been very restrained throughout the world cup though, bless them.
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:47:12
    reality_cheque wrote:
    Maybe we just need a 'sex' category, and a way to filter it out if you don't want to read it.
    That's a similar argument that was brought up when there was an over proliferation of porn threads and it was turned down for similar reasons to why a sex category would be turned down.
  • morriss 29 Jun 2006 13:52:49 71,293 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    reality_cheque wrote:
    York wrote:
    What's 3 + 1 mean?
    God, you're SO last week.



    :p

    There are 3+1 threads about sex today though. :)
  • Stickman 29 Jun 2006 13:53:18 29,986 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    LiquidSun wrote:
    Stickman wrote:
    I'd say serious ones were OK (although they'd be few and far between), but stuff like T.G's "Hey, I had loads of sex for ages. Aren't I great?" is just bollocks.

    You're just jealous. ;)

    I know. Sour grapes.
  • morriss 29 Jun 2006 13:54:24 71,293 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Ahab wrote:
    kalel wrote:
    Not being a "grammar nazi", but the whole 'fewer' 'less' thing has always confused me, but in this case I could have sworn it should have been less.

    From wiki:

    "The difference between less and fewer is that the former refers to an amount, while the latter refers to a numbered quantity of undivided items."

    So in this case you're talking about an amount no?

    I don't think so, "threads" are undivided items and not measured with a continuous quantity (so not an "amount" in the wikipedia terminology, although I think their wording is a bit crap) so fewer is correct, cf "less rice" but "fewer grains of rice" (ie. a lower number of). Not a native speaker though, so I don't know shit :-D

    I usually go by the notion of 'is the noun countable'? You can't have 1 rice, 2 rice, so it's 'less'. But you can have 1 thread or 2 threads so it's 'fewer'.
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 13:56:34
    I guess these things just happen.

    Lets just ignore them and get on.

    I for one am going to be avoiding this place when the "PS3 is teh utter sh1t" threads go up around November.

    Not a lot of gaming news = non-gaming threads = (whatever is on peoples minds + mostly men) = sex threads.

    In other news they had preorder boxes for Prey in my local GAME. And I bought an official Nintendo DS Lite Case in light blue.
  • tiddles 29 Jun 2006 13:57:55 3,555 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 20 years ago
    Ahab wrote:
    Not a native speaker though, so I don't know shit :-D

    Or alternatively, likely to have a far better grasp of English grammar than most people around here... :)
  • username 29 Jun 2006 13:59:11 848 posts
    Seen 2 weeks ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    Stickman wrote:
    I know. Sour grapes.
    You can get cream for that.
  • djchump 29 Jun 2006 14:05:32 4,463 posts
    Seen 14 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    MetalDog wrote:
    It would be ultra great to be able to filter out specific catagories. The sports fans have been very restrained throughout the world cup though, bless them.
    I filter out people - by ignoring idiots. That way you don't see the dumb threads ;-)
  • York 29 Jun 2006 14:14:41 8,667 posts
    Seen 13 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    reality_cheque wrote:
    York wrote:
    What's 3 + 1 mean?
    God, you're SO last week.



    :p
    Fair enough. I guess it'll just haunt me for the rest of my life.

    ;_;
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 14:23:36
    OK, I've been told.
  • reality_cheque 29 Jun 2006 14:35:41 7,486 posts
    Seen 2 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    York wrote:
    Fair enough. I guess it'll just haunt me for the rest of my life.

    ;_;
    Aww, OK, I'll tell you - it comes from a story about a dog with 3 legs but a really big cock*



    * May not be true
  • Deleted user 29 June 2006 14:41:04
    reality_cheque wrote:
    York wrote:
    Fair enough. I guess it'll just haunt me for the rest of my life.

    ;_;
    Aww, OK, I'll tell you - it comes from a story about a dog with 3 legs but a really big cock*

    A dog? 3 legs, you say? And a cock?

    Sounds like a Paul and Heather McCartney joke if ever i heard one.
  • tourlord 29 Jun 2006 14:41:47 2,600 posts
    Registered 16 years ago
    LOL!
  • Stickman 29 Jun 2006 14:42:14 29,986 posts
    Seen 5 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    You're on form today Fozzie!
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.