Possible problem with Wii being positioned as a "second" console

    First Previous
  • DrDamn 31 Jul 2006 12:53:38 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    The Wii has been positioned as a second console to own by both MS and Sony. No doubt pleasing Nintendo, second console for majority of both = top console overall etc.

    One thing which does concern me is not necessarily the lack of graphic oomph as such, but the standard def output. A reasonable number of people will have upgraded their TV's to hi-def, driven by the X360 and eventually PS3. The problem is that Standard Def stuff on a high def display looks worse in a lot of respects than on a Standard Def display.

    This will be worse depending on what sort of TV you ended up buying. The cheaper hi-def TV's will have less capable scaling hardware.

    So is there any chance at all Wii will ever output hi-def or are there hardware reasons which rule it out?
  • richardiox 31 Jul 2006 12:55:47 10,099 posts
    Seen 6 hours ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Wii will output at 480p over component so, as far as I can gather, will still look very nice on a HD set.
  • gizmo 31 Jul 2006 12:56:12 2,100 posts
    Seen 3 years ago
    Registered 19 years ago
    Its a very good point, and I think Nintendo have dropped a bit of a clanger here. When I plug any SD source into my HD screen after playing on the 360 it really does look poor. No other way to describe it. But then I expect that of the 'old' xbox, ps2 etc. The problem is, if I'd just shelled for a brand new Wii, and it looks poor, thats a problem.

    Edit: Didn't realise it did 480p, but even this looks relatively poor on a large HD screen (50" in this case, which may sway my view)

    Edited by gizmo at 12:57:24 31-07-2006
  • Sid-Nice 31 Jul 2006 12:58:34 15,848 posts
    Seen 4 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    DrDamn wrote:
    The Wii has been positioned as a second console to own by both MS and Sony. No doubt pleasing Nintendo, second console for majority of both = top console overall etc.

    One thing which does concern me is not necessarily the lack of graphic oomph as such, but the standard def output. A reasonable number of people will have upgraded their TV's to hi-def, driven by the X360 and eventually PS3. The problem is that Standard Def stuff on a high def display looks worse in a lot of respects than on a Standard Def display.

    This will be worse depending on what sort of TV you ended up buying. The cheaper hi-def TV's will have less capable scaling hardware.

    So is there any chance at all Wii will ever output hi-def or are there hardware reasons which rule it out?

    The Wii will use the 480p resolution; I have a Panasonic Q running at 480p on a 50" Samsung HDTV. Resident Evil 4 looks a hell of a lot better than Prey.
  • djchump 31 Jul 2006 12:59:50 4,463 posts
    Seen 14 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    We've got cheapish HD TVs at work and the upscaling is pretty gash on them, so they do make SD signals look pretty crap.
    TBH though - it's more an issue with buying the cheaper HD TVs than something Nintendo can do anything about :-/
  • Eighthours 31 Jul 2006 12:59:57 713 posts
    Seen 20 hours ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    The annoying thing is that you can be damn sure the Wii won't come bundled with a component cable. They'll probably be short of official ones for months.
  • DrDamn 31 Jul 2006 13:15:00 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    rhythm wrote:
    ecosse_011172 wrote:
    I know plenty of people have been very impressed with upscaled DVDs...

    I'm one of 'em :-) Upscaled 480P (whether DVDs or Xbox) looks great on my 720P projector. It's just a shame I can't get a component connector for the GC for any reasonable price :-(

    Upscaling of a DVD picture is a bit different in terms of what the picture is composed of. A 480p output of a console is full of straight lines and use of specific pixels. It could be resolved somewhat with good use of anti-aliasing though. Where is the best place to get actual size Wii screen grabs? (i.e. ones with a twat at the side playing :-).
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 13:19:25
    DrDamn wrote: The Wii has been positioned as a second console to own by both MS and Sony. No doubt pleasing Nintendo, second console for majority of both = top console overall etc.

    One thing which does concern me is not necessarily the lack of graphic oomph as such, but the standard def output. A reasonable number of people will have upgraded their TV's to hi-def, driven by the X360 and eventually PS3. The problem is that Standard Def stuff on a high def display looks worse in a lot of respects than on a Standard Def display.
    Many many Europeans will not upgrade to high-definition television sets just yet. It's really too expensive right now for the average games consumer. Maybe in a few years...

    I for one don't see any advantage to getting HD TV straight away. Give me two or three years when the TVs are affordable and the players are affordable, and the HD DVDs/BRDs have come down substantially in price.
    DrDamn wrote: So is there any chance at all Wii will ever output hi-def or are there hardware reasons which rule it out?
    Dunno. I don't think it can be done, but you'd best ask SilentBob shit like that.
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 13:22:49
    THe uptake of HD tvs is and will be relatively speaking, considerably low for a good while yet.

    Look at this way, how many of you know people that still have an old 1970/1980s brown wooden TV with no scart sockets?
  • nickthegun 31 Jul 2006 13:24:53 87,712 posts
    Seen 2 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    90% of the population havent got HD tellies. Of the 10% who have, 5% wont know how to set them up properly*.

    In summary, this is the biggest non-issue since Sonys removal of the HDMI port.


    *non-scientific study of figures plucked from my arse.
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 13:34:24
    It seems to me that most folk don't even have HD sets, and even of those that don't, there are still a large proportion of them that see HD as a fad. I don't think Nintendo will suffer from any lack of HD output at all. On the contrary, it could be viewed as a positive for many people.

    I don't have a HD set myself, and to be honest if my current Panny broke down, I would still get a "regular" CRT to replace it.

    Not that that means anything in the grand scheme of things, mind...

    Edited by TUESDAYS!! at 13:37:05 31-07-2006
  • Freek 31 Jul 2006 13:36:57 7,682 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    And as pointed out 480P upscales nicely so it's a non issue either way.
  • DrDamn 31 Jul 2006 13:43:09 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    HairyArse wrote:
    THe uptake of HD tvs is and will be relatively speaking, considerably low for a good while yet.

    Look at this way, how many of you know people that still have an old 1970/1980s brown wooden TV with no scart sockets?

    Yes, but my original point was with the Wii being a second console. I think you will find the uptake of HDTV's amongst X360 and eventual PS3 owners is substantially higher than a straw poll of your grans house.

    You also have to factor in that a console's life is ~5 years. So the stats now are nowhere near as important as the stats in 2 or 3 years time.

    Electronics companies are reporting better results based on the uptake of hi-def tvs, Telewest and Sky have just launched their HD TV services. Currys.digital have dropped CRT tv's completely.

    There is a certain of sticking your head in the sand going on here. Hi-def is here and becoming widespread quicker than you might think.
  • DrDamn 31 Jul 2006 13:45:22 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Hyoushi wrote:

    it only has an analog out


    Same with the X360, you can still do hi-def analog.
  • Onny 31 Jul 2006 13:49:09 5,695 posts
    Seen 10 hours ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Next gen machines; they'll all fookin DOOMED!!!
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 13:53:07
    I'm planning to stick to CRT, even when I do get a High Definition set (I'm guessing that the Samsung HD CRT will have more competition by then, but if not I'll go for that one when it's a bit cheaper). I gather upscaling isn't an issue with those, although I can't be bothered to find out why.
  • DrDamn 31 Jul 2006 16:26:49 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    dravenclarke wrote:
    beacuse CRT sets will look good no matter what rs you feed them, weres some LCD sets look shit in anything other than there native res.

    Which is actually my original point. The Wii won't ouput at the native res and people will think it is the Wii which is shit and not their TV. After all their X360/PS3 look superb on their TV.
  • Bazlurgan 31 Jul 2006 20:09:30 25 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    480p looks fine on my 50" plasma and 26" LCD - this is using the gamecube.

    Shouldn't be too much of a worry.

    I'm guessing that the gamecube component cable will likely work with the Wii, but we'll see idc.
  • ralphwolfenstein 31 Jul 2006 20:31:15 1,038 posts
    Seen 8 years ago
    Registered 19 years ago
    I've seen Wii software running on those lovely 32" Samsung HD TVs, and it looks fantastic

    For the 5% of Nintendo's target market that only has a Hi Def TV, you have nothing to worry about - unless you really can't bear to sully your screens with 'last generation' graphics, albeit graphics at the Resi 4/F-Zero GX end of the quality pool...

    The fact that MS and Sony are 'positioning' the Wii as a second console is also irrelevant. It might be the logical second choice for their target audience (ie, the current gaming audience slightly broadened by the natural widening demographic as existing gamers get older), but the fact is, the Wii is going to sell to the mass market right from day one, not year two

    It's a very simplistic analogy, but when a DS can outsell a PSP by 7:1 every week in Japan and 3:1 in the UK, you know the strategy's working. The Wii is the DS concept amplified ten-fold. Its going to sell bucket loads

    Although, if I hear one more Nintendo Europe employee crowing about their company's amazing successes as if they'd personally designed Nintendogs on the back of a cigarette packet in a pub in Camden instead of having nothing more strenuous to do than sit back and watch wave after wave of AAA quality 'I-can-sell-myself' software roll in from Japan, I'll bite their face off
  • morriss 31 Jul 2006 20:36:24 71,293 posts
    Seen 3 months ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    grayson wrote:
    i wondered why i couldnt sleep last night

    +1
  • Machetazo 31 Jul 2006 20:55:46 6,373 posts
    Seen 9 months ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    I saw this thread, and thought you were going to highlight something else, as a possible stumbling block: Software Sales.

    If it's true that console holders lose money on consoles, which they then claw back from software sales; after launch buzz has died down, will people still be as readily filling their secondary game library, when the heaviest hitters (and probably most advrtised/hyped games) are likely to be coming out for rival consoles?
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 20:59:48
    Machetazo wrote:
    I saw this thread, and thought you were going to highlight something else, as a possible stumbling block: Software Sales.

    If it's true that console holders lose money on consoles, which they then claw back from software sales; after launch buzz has died down, will people still be as readily filling their secondary game library, when the heaviest hitters (and probably most advrtised/hyped games) are likely to be coming out for rival consoles?
    Doesn't matter, Nintendo actually make a profit on their consoles.
  • yegon 31 Jul 2006 21:04:02 6,511 posts
    Seen 6 months ago
    Registered 18 years ago
    morriss wrote:
    grayson wrote:
    i wondered why i couldnt sleep last night

    +1

    So, making a valid topic of discussion is less worthy than turning up in a thread you're blatantly not interested in, responding with the equivalent of meh....? Hmm.

    Eighthours wrote:
    The annoying thing is that you can be damn sure the Wii won't come bundled with a component cable. They'll probably be short of official ones for months.

    Yeah, that is a bummer. They'll be like rocking horse shit.

    If my US GC via component is anything to go by, the Wii will look great, albeit not as spanky as a 360/PS3 obviously.
  • yiannis 31 Jul 2006 23:45:47 308 posts
    Registered 18 years ago
    Question... what did people do with their old 34"+ SD widescreens and such?
    throw them away possibly? or did they all sold them?


    Perhaps now they are simply the second (or third ..) TV of the house?
  • Deleted user 31 July 2006 23:49:42
    yiannis wrote: Question... What did people do with their old 34"+ SD widescreens and such? Throw them away possibly? Or did they sell them? Perhaps now they are simply the second (or third ..) TV of the house?
    My 28" SD television is still the main television of the house. Have a little 14" too in my room.
  • DrDamn 1 Aug 2006 09:08:38 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    ralphwolfenstein wrote:
    I've seen Wii software running on those lovely 32" Samsung HD TVs, and it looks fantastic

    Ok, well that's good to hear.


    but the fact is, the Wii is going to sell to the mass market right from day one, not year two

    Now that I don't agree with for two main reasons. Number one Wii will sell out for a significant time to the Nintendo fan base. A global launch for any manufacturer = shortages. The mass market will not buy until they can walk in to the shops and pick one off a shelf, the mass market certainly do not pre-order a console. The second point is that, as mentioned by MasterThief, it is easy to see the world as what we see on the internet and not the reality. The features which will sell the Wii to the mass market are the sort which benefit from the "I want one of those" mentality. You see it round a friends house and then want it. That sort of sell through also does not start from day one.


    It's a very simplistic analogy, but when a DS can outsell a PSP by 7:1 every week in Japan and 3:1 in the UK, you know the strategy's working. The Wii is the DS concept amplified ten-fold. Its going to sell bucket loads

    Too simplistic. Handheld and home console are such very different markets.
  • Genji 1 Aug 2006 09:11:31 19,682 posts
    Seen 10 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    On the HD thing: I don't think I could care less. Given the cool reception HD has had in this country, I'm not sure the public will care too much, either.
  • DrDamn 1 Aug 2006 09:25:26 1,216 posts
    Seen 2 days ago
    Registered 16 years ago
    Genji wrote:
    On the HD thing: I don't think I could care less. Given the cool reception HD has had in this country, I'm not sure the public will care too much, either.

    I did write a big reply to this, but then thought why bother, your head is too deep in the sand already.



    Edited by DrDamn at 09:26:33 01-08-2006
  • Genji 1 Aug 2006 09:32:07 19,682 posts
    Seen 10 years ago
    Registered 17 years ago
    Pardon me? Oh, I'm sorry, I should have realised that not caring about HD makes me some sort of anti-progress luddite.

    DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
  • First Previous
Sign in or register to reply

Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.