ChiefGB wrote:Hope so. I was rather expecting it to be long and probably dull, although I can't see how it can be as dull as #2.
The Hobbit • Page 52
Mola_Ram 17,579 posts
Seen 4 hours ago
Registered 6 years ago
jimnastics wrote:A lot of the comments appear to be of the "it was too long and boring" variety, which applies whether you've read the book or not. And in any case, why is it up to you to decide whether someone is "too involved or invested" in something? People are fans of the book, and want the films to reflect what they liked about it. What's wrong with that?
Sometimes I think it's easy to get in to comic book guy mode if you are too involved or invested in something, which I'll be honest comes across a lot in many posts in this thread.
M83J01P97 7,552 posts
Seen 4 days ago
Registered 11 years ago
I think the main problem a lot of people have with Peter Jacksons: The Hobbit is that he's taken the original, and much beloved story, and adding a lot of unessicsary extras to it, some of which wasn't in any of the Middle Earth set books at all.
At least with his LOTR trilogy the films were mostly faithful to the source material give or take.
Well he needs to do something to split one book into three movies!!!! If my memory is correct it isnt even as long as one of the lotr books
beastmaster 18,086 posts
Seen 3 hours ago
Registered 14 years ago
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug Extended Edition Blu-ray
An extra 25 minutes which takes it to 186 minutes.
Why? Was to it too boring for the theatrical cut?
Sometimes posts may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.